Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Legal group poised to quiz Clinton aides about email server [View all]Akicita
(1,196 posts)20. The well informed know that the SD demanded the emails back. Shame on the news media for allowing
Hillary to get away with her assertions that she volunteered to return her emails and make them public. The facts are that the SD demanded them back and the federal court ordered they be made public. Most of the public probably believes Hillary's assertions because the media watchdogs refuse to challenge her.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I have been thinking about that and not too longer afterwards Biden came out and made a statement
Samantha
Apr 2016
#70
"Longtime Clinton Attorney Now Representing Hillary in FBI’s Criminal Probe"
tomm2thumbs
Apr 2016
#3
Who they are adds insult to injury, but unfortunately it is Clinton's actions that put them in
karynnj
Apr 2016
#10
The OBVIOUS question is why are they having some outside group do it instead of the government?
pdsimdars
Apr 2016
#7
Judicial Watch filed many FOIA requests that they now claim were not responded to in a timely
karynnj
Apr 2016
#11
Nothing was covered up? All of Hilliary's emails were kept hidden from FOIA discovery
Akicita
Apr 2016
#18
The well informed know that the SD demanded the emails back. Shame on the news media for allowing
Akicita
Apr 2016
#20
That's the Clinton playbook alright. Drag it out, drag it out, then say it is old news.
Akicita
Apr 2016
#21
It was intentional. How can a response to a nonsensical post possibly make sense?
beastie boy
Apr 2016
#38
I am disgusted that we're back to having to defend a Clinton again, parsing words and legalities
riderinthestorm
Apr 2016
#47
Yes, thank God its Larry Klayman and JW and not some far right nut jobs!!! HAHAHA
winstars
Apr 2016
#57
Glaring bad judgment by H. Clinton to have handled govt. communications this way
tabasco
Apr 2016
#80