Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

former9thward

(33,424 posts)
25. What large monetary settlements?
Sun Mar 8, 2015, 05:52 PM
Mar 2015
“The rules are clear,” adds Robert Alpert Sr., senior counsel and co-leader of a crisis management practice at the Atlanta law firm Morris Manning & Martin. The Montreal Convention, Alpert points out, has a two-tiered approach: It grants up to $175,000 in automatic compensation regardless of fault for proven damages, but also allows for unlimited damages above that if the airline can be proved negligent. Payouts for previous crashes in which negligence was proved were high: Pan Am had to pay a total of more than $500 million when Flight 103 was blown up over Lockerbie, Scotland (the plaintiffs prevailed in their claim that the airline was to blame for lax security), and ComAir paid $264 million in the case of Flight 5191, which crashed in Lexington, Ky., in 2006 after pilots used the wrong runway during takeoff.

But in the case of MH370, unless they find the airplane, the cockpit voice recorder, and the flight data recorder — and those devices can categorically prove terrorism or some other form of negligence — there’s a distinct possibility these families will get little or nothing above the standard $175,000. This crash, Alpert says, “might turn out to be very inexpensive.”


http://fortune.com/2014/05/01/the-big-money-surprise-about-malaysia-airlines-flight-370/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Heard this opinion by famous psychic crime detective Noreen Renier NJCher Mar 2015 #1
Let me crank up my psychic abilities. rickford66 Mar 2015 #2
Aw, give Noreen a chance PADemD Mar 2015 #3
The facts as we know them agree with my prediction. rickford66 Mar 2015 #5
BWAHAHAHA FLPanhandle Mar 2015 #13
so happy NJCher Mar 2015 #14
IT'S IN KAZAKHSTAN, HAVING BEEN HIJACKED ON ORDERS FROM PUTIN! Joe Johns Mar 2015 #4
Actually I lean towards that theory also. EX500rider Mar 2015 #7
To leave little or no evidence. rickford66 Mar 2015 #8
Remember "The Miracle on the Hudson" ? rickford66 Mar 2015 #11
That was one of the few times a jetliner hasn't broken up during a water landing.. EX500rider Mar 2015 #15
Maybe or maybe not. rickford66 Mar 2015 #18
No, if it had sunk there would have been a lot of floating material. former9thward Mar 2015 #20
Both water ditchings occured at the same altitude .... 0 ft SL. rickford66 Mar 2015 #21
At least you admit only CT can explain no debris. former9thward Mar 2015 #23
CT = "crazy theories" ? rickford66 Mar 2015 #24
Lots of word salad. No motive. Doesn't match known data. rickford66 Mar 2015 #9
"Doesn't match known data." EX500rider Mar 2015 #16
I was more concerned about motives. rickford66 Mar 2015 #17
What motive does the pilot have to make monetary settlements for the passengers? EX500rider Mar 2015 #19
"What motive does the pilot have to make monetary settlements for the passengers?" rickford66 Mar 2015 #29
"I could do it and I'm not a pilot." EX500rider Mar 2015 #36
You missread me rickford66 Mar 2015 #37
whatever the case... NJCher Mar 2015 #6
It's not in the ocean, nor did it crash in the ocean Reter Mar 2015 #10
Name some viable motives for your theories. rickford66 Mar 2015 #12
What large monetary settlements? former9thward Mar 2015 #25
$175,000 isn't bad if you're dirt poor to start with. rickford66 Mar 2015 #27
Kick Joe Johns Mar 2015 #22
"It’s hard to come up with a plausible motive for an act that has no apparent beneficiaries." rickford66 Mar 2015 #26
I wonder if CNN will spend another liberalhistorian Mar 2015 #28
If so much as a piece is found treestar Mar 2015 #35
Sure, in another 60-70 years I'm fairly confident it could be found too Baclava Mar 2015 #30
...in Benghazi! Comrade Grumpy Mar 2015 #31
Police Psychic Detective Noreen Renier did not find lost aircraft amindformurder Mar 2015 #32
after that german airline does anyone think one of the pilots intentionally crashed this one also ? JI7 Mar 2015 #33
Yes, that's been indicated strongly treestar Mar 2015 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»MH370: Missing Malaysia A...»Reply #25