Announcements

Callmecrazy

(3,068 posts)

36. Who decides what's disruptive?

Mon Apr 1, 2019, 04:08 PM

Apr 2019

If I have a question about my candidate that may not follow the herd, will I get shut down?
I'm going to have tough questions about our candidates. This is a serious job and I'll be asking some frank questions. If the questions ruffle some feathers I suggest you simply don't answer instead of trying to silence someone who is looking for information.
If the hosts start getting bossy and decide which way the direction a forum or thread should be going, it defeats the whole purpose of a DISCUSSION BOARD.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The 2020 Democratic presidential candidate supporter groups are live! [View all] Skinner Apr 2019 OP

Good move. fleabiscuit Apr 2019 #1

KnR for getting this show on the road Hekate Apr 2019 #2

Thanks, Skinner, EarlG, and Elad! Cha Apr 2019 #3

A humble thanks. NT SWBTATTReg Apr 2019 #4

I appreciate all the admins' efforts, but I don't feel great about this to be honest. Maven Apr 2019 #5

Actually the opposite happened to me, watoos Apr 2019 #21

But where's Mike Gravel...? brooklynite Apr 2019 #6

Great idea! This sounds like something Pete would think up. mobeau69 Apr 2019 #7

Thank You Sherman A1 Apr 2019 #8

To protect my mental health safeinOhio Apr 2019 #9

Are we there yet? Lazy Daisy Apr 2019 #40

Will the hosts of these groups be permitted to make a "hit list" of disapproved DUers... joshcryer Apr 2019 #10

Really? DownriverDem Apr 2019 #19

A member can only be blocked out of a group if they first POST in that group. Skinner Apr 2019 #27

Great job! nt yaesu Apr 2019 #11

And you couldn't have picked a more appropriate day rocktivity Apr 2019 #12

Excellent!!!!!! n/t RKP5637 Apr 2019 #13

So as an undecided, where do I go to ask questions about efhmc Apr 2019 #14

The Democratic Primaries forum EarlG Apr 2019 #17

K&R stonecutter357 Apr 2019 #15

Well done, gentlemen. Thank you very much. WheelWalker Apr 2019 #16

Ha Ha Funny April Fools joke. Oh, wait. These ARE real! FailureToCommunicate Apr 2019 #18

Great. Only one rule concerns me... LiberalLovinLug Apr 2019 #20

My advice: Skinner Apr 2019 #28

I agreed with the first post, until I read this reply. Socal31 Apr 2019 #35

Okay. It's a high watermark though LiberalLovinLug Apr 2019 #39

i was hoping for something like this samnsara Apr 2019 #22

I think it's an interesting approach. defacto7 Apr 2019 #23

We reserve the right to get rid of all the candidate groups if they are a source of problems. Skinner Apr 2019 #29

OK! Go for it! defacto7 Apr 2019 #31

Very well thought out. I do not want want to redo the 2016 or 2012 primaries. Thank you for ... marble falls Apr 2019 #24

Thank you! nt Heartstrings Apr 2019 #25

Sounds good. Thank you. DesertRat Apr 2019 #26

Even though I've been posting..... Firestorm49 Apr 2019 #30

Nice. Two thumbs up! Politicub Apr 2019 #32

Thank you for this decision. OhNo-Really Apr 2019 #33

Who decides what's disruptive? Callmecrazy Apr 2019 #36

+100 applegrove Apr 2019 #34

Bookmarking. nt littlemissmartypants Apr 2019 #37

sounds like a good framework, but i wish we could pick a top 2. mopinko Apr 2019 #38

Great idea, and thanks for all the hard work! SergeStorms Apr 2019 #41

I'm not undecided, but my candidate isn't running yet Amyishere Apr 2019 #42

Thank you democrank Apr 2019 #43

Post removed Post removed Apr 2019 #44

Where do I find the old groups for high profile Democrats? MH1 Apr 2019 #45

Most of them are retired, here: Skinner Apr 2019 #46

Thanks. nt. MH1 Apr 2019 #47

Post removed Post removed Apr 2019 #48