Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Announcements
In reply to the discussion: A word about the ongoing Democratic presidential primaries [View all]Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)217. You're still fairly new
        There was a time when the vicious backbiting wasn't allowed here.
I'm glad to see an effort to move back in that direction. 
								
                                        
                                        
							
								 
								
									
                                    Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
                                    
    
    
        
        Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							658 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
        
        off-topic but I watched a few hours of the House of Commons debate on the "Snooper's charter" bill..
        steve2470
        Mar 2016
        #377
      
        
        thank you, I think you, Labour and the SNP are on the right track with this! :)  nt
        steve2470
        Mar 2016
        #426
      
        
        Same here. I do prefer Sanders, but the MOST important thing is no INSANE Republicans!
        LeftishBrit
        Mar 2016
        #641
      
        
        Well, I was just curious as to what the mechanism was. How will decisions deemed clearly "egregious"
        villager
        Mar 2016
        #137
      
        
        Good stuff, thanks. I agree with the changes to the jury system, especially the time outs.
        marble falls
        Mar 2016
        #10
      
        
        I know someone whose name is an unmemorable tangle of letters and numbers who's going to be
        Number23
        Mar 2016
        #258
      
        
        I'd like to remind you, Hillary lost 2008 with 1639.5 delegates and 257 superdelegates.
        AtheistCrusader
        Mar 2016
        #261
      
        
        totally lame.   they are acting like M$NBC and all the others who are all in for Hillary.
        litlbilly
        Mar 2016
        #174
      
        
        I am going to be mostly a lurker now, which is what they want.  Wont do much IMO.  The Bernie
        litlbilly
        Mar 2016
        #225
      
        
        How fun is DU gonna be now, it'll just be Hillaryites drooling all over themselves.  Will be as fun
        litlbilly
        Mar 2016
        #392
      
        
        I'm certainly tired of being told I have no say whatsoever in our party's nomination.
        MoonchildCA
        Mar 2016
        #272
      
        
        nothing. but truthful facts about a candidate that are not flattering are not attacks.
        restorefreedom
        Mar 2016
        #433
      
        
        I see it as them putting their thumbs on the scale like DWS and the DNC.  Just trying to dampen
        litlbilly
        Mar 2016
        #220
      
        
        I don't think she was banned; it was just that her post was unjustly hidden
        muriel_volestrangler
        Mar 2016
        #435
      
        
        She's adopted so many positions of his that one must assume she admires him greatly--
        merrily
        Mar 2016
        #529
      
        
        Actually, based on some alerts that I've seen it seems to be a handy excuse
        Gormy Cuss
        Mar 2016
        #276
      
        
        If there's a specific post that breaks the rules, you can alert on it
        muriel_volestrangler
        Mar 2016
        #588
      
        
        I think Skinner has said he feels a direct 'report to MIRT' button on each post would get abused
        muriel_volestrangler
        Mar 2016
        #601
      
        
        Actually, my original point on calling people trolls was that it's not a personal attack
        Gormy Cuss
        Mar 2016
        #605
      
        
        Strict enforcement of that rule was one of the things that made DU2 better than DU3
        Turborama
        Mar 2016
        #496
      
        
        A Bernie supporter here who also thinks the Hillary venom is getting overwrought...
        villager
        Mar 2016
        #149
      
        
        Same here. The first thing you saw on the home page were really nasty posts from
        justhanginon
        Mar 2016
        #409
      
        
        We are hoping that Trump being the nominee will help speed up the process of turning Texas blue
        Gothmog
        Mar 2016
        #278
      
        
        Hallelujah! Praise be! A judicious and wise decision. And, none too early, either!
        Surya Gayatri
        Mar 2016
        #45
      
        
        All fine and needed, except lifting the 5 hide ban doesn't follow from encouraging hiding the worst.
        morningfog
        Mar 2016
        #64
      
        
        Yup, I think getting rid of the 5 hides suspension swings us too far back the other way
        progree
        Mar 2016
        #145
      
        
        I was five hides banned because one of them came from commenting in a safe-haven group accidentally.
        vkkv
        Mar 2016
        #215
      
        
        Well, it is only 90 days time out if you run up your 5 hides within a day or two.
        morningfog
        Mar 2016
        #234
      
        
        Even a time out doesn't stop them. They just switch from toxic posts to toxic pms.
        merrily
        Mar 2016
        #288
      
        
        And then there's a sane poster whose threads got hundreds of recs and replies.
        merrily
        Mar 2016
        #530
      
        
        With no fear of suspension, GD:P has turned into a raging crime scene. In only a matter of hours.
        ebayfool
        Mar 2016
        #621
      
        
        Transparency pages will still become visible when someone has five hides. (nt)
        Skinner
        Mar 2016
        #578
      
        
        Thank you, hoping beyond all hope this works. I do have one major objection ....
        etherealtruth
        Mar 2016
        #72
      
        
        re: Fuck Donald Trump, patience.  That is what the general election campaign is for.
        BlueStreak
        Mar 2016
        #83
      
        
        Thank you so much. I'm glad you are allowing the 5 hide people to post. Nt
        ProudToBeLiberal
        Mar 2016
        #88
      
        
        I appreciate your efforts.  I hope that your improved jury system includes limiting how often
        rhett o rick
        Mar 2016
        #103
      
        
        Question for Skinner  - If I say Trump is to the left of Hillary on trade and regime change 
        jillan
        Mar 2016
        #106
      
        
        There are other candidates that I do not trust in addition to Trump -btw my question was for Skinner
        jillan
        Mar 2016
        #122
      
        
        If you say "people should vote for Trump because he's to the left of Hillary on trade",
        Nye Bevan
        Mar 2016
        #158
      
        
        Once again, demonstrating why you are one of my most favorite posters!
        Behind the Aegis
        Mar 2016
        #190
      
        
        True.  There are some who are on vacation so often that I hadn't bothered
        winter is coming
        Mar 2016
        #462
      
        
        I'm safe, I can't bring myself to speak !#%~$'s name, let alone write it on electronic paper.
        Impedimentus
        Mar 2016
        #131
      
        
        I looked it up, it was 1983 when my friend Neil made me swear to hate Donald Trump.
        Bluenorthwest
        Mar 2016
        #141
      
        
        Did Neil tell you any stories about how Donald did what he did?  As to what
        Jackie Wilson Said
        Mar 2016
        #265
      
        
        Thank you. These short-term changes are welcome, and I look forward to the long-term changes as well
        yardwork
        Mar 2016
        #154
      
        
        They were banned for encouraging DUers to sign pledges that they would never vote for Hillary.
        yardwork
        Mar 2016
        #171
      
        
        That information is directly from the PPR message from Admins on their profiles:
        yardwork
        Mar 2016
        #352
      
        
        No, I don't. First, your post did not even match what the admin said about Manny.
        merrily
        Mar 2016
        #381
      
        
        Wrong,  L0on did NOT urge DU members to sign that pledge. Here is what L0on posted for discussion.
        Autumn
        Mar 2016
        #415
      
        
        Well then take it up with Skinner.  Those are the reasons he gave in his own words in his own post.
        Amimnoch
        Mar 2016
        #545
      
        
        YOU take it up with whoever you want. I know what the two posts actually said.
        merrily
        Mar 2016
        #546
      
        
        'You' read the posts and interpreted them the way you wanted to ......... obviously.
        polly7
        Mar 2016
        #353
      
        
        Loonix and Manny were banned for violating the ToS, not due to the jury system.
        NuclearDem
        Mar 2016
        #295
      
        
        So how is allowing people who have 5, 10, 15, or god-knows-how-many hides to continue to post here
        kath
        Mar 2016
        #165
      
        
        I'm tired of fighting conservatives, that's what I came to DU to get away from in the first place
        Fumesucker
        Mar 2016
        #250
      
        
        Yep. Not much point in spending much time at a place with so many conservatives,cult-of-personality
        kath
        Mar 2016
        #259
      
        
        This place is going to be a fantastic advertisement to independents looking at Hillary
        Fumesucker
        Mar 2016
        #411
      
        
        If I understand what is going on, what has changed is you no longer have to
        Jackie Wilson Said
        Mar 2016
        #267
      
        
        In your opinion. Far more well-warranted hides for people with serious anger-control issues and/or
        kath
        Mar 2016
        #508
      
        
        I really hope this doesn't lead to an outright demand for Sanders supporters to STFU.
        DemocraticWing
        Mar 2016
        #187
      
        
        One worry -- I vote to LEAVE posts that are no worse than what they are responding to
        progree
        Mar 2016
        #198
      
        
        I think this concern may encourage jurors to better explain their rationale for their vote.
        missingthebigdog
        Mar 2016
        #281
      
        
        Oh sure, I agree.  I think the context thing is mostly when two people get into calling each other
        progree
        Mar 2016
        #471
      
        
        Click on the "My Account" link - two over from your name, on the top right of the page
        Lucinda
        Mar 2016
        #379
      
        
        The worst of the worst here still does not compare the garbage at the Washington Post, MSNBC, etc.
        Carlo Marx
        Mar 2016
        #212
      
        
        People have been blocked from both the Hillary and Bernie groups. At some point
        applegrove
        Mar 2016
        #249
      
        
        If you would like to be allowed back into the Hillary group, please write to one of the hosts.
        yardwork
        Mar 2016
        #357
      
        
        I am a Hillary supporter. I was giving that as an example. That we need to try to be inclusive at
        applegrove
        Mar 2016
        #445
      
        
        Q: Does "not featured on home page" include Trending and Greatest lists? (n/t)
        thesquanderer
        Mar 2016
        #257
      
        
        Yes. The site owners know DU helps spread info and stories so they are squashing that
        Cheese Sandwich
        Mar 2016
        #403
      
        
        I think this is reasonable and can be lived with by just about everyone here who wants to stay here
        leveymg
        Mar 2016
        #260
      
        
        Bernie seems to be the uncle I've always wanted. Hillary, like the sister I love but >
        YOHABLO
        Mar 2016
        #270
      
        
        hooray!!  I applaud your efforts to minimize of the hyper-partisanship which infected the jury
        Bill USA
        Mar 2016
        #271
      
        
        "Cool story, bro" is such a mindless cliche, it deserves a hide for that alone.
        merrily
        Mar 2016
        #317
      
        
        I have had the pleasure of serving many times as a juror and have seen much Hide Abuse in the last
        orpupilofnature57
        Mar 2016
        #344
      
        
        It's my understanding this wasn't done in 2008 when it was improbable for Hillary to still win.
        Cassiopeia
        Mar 2016
        #359
      
        
        Speaking to the issue of those that have the ability to take off their candidate supporter hats and
        Wash. state Desk Jet
        Mar 2016
        #408
      
        
        This looks good.  Only question I have is that until the convention, delegates can still
        JudyM
        Mar 2016
        #410
      
        
        If trashing Clinton or Sanders is now prohibited, it was hidden in their
        The Second Stone
        Mar 2016
        #418
      
        
        I completely lost control and went over a line big time and got 7 hides in one day.
        hrmjustin
        Mar 2016
        #429
      
        
        I was on three but the first two i felt were unfair. The last one I deserved.
        hrmjustin
        Mar 2016
        #551
      
        
        I'm at lunch at work at my desk reading this. The professionalism regarding ....
        Upthevibe
        Mar 2016
        #442
      
        
        I will second your P.S to the Trumpster..............and the horse he road in on................
        turbinetree
        Mar 2016
        #440
      
        
        "The people that are perpetually on time-outs are that way because they cannot(or will not)be civil"
        kath
        Mar 2016
        #498
      
        
        This is something we are likely to do when we completely overhaul the jury system...
        Skinner
        Mar 2016
        #596
      
        
        My honest opinion after 13 years? Nope. Not really. It's a message board.
        ScreamingMeemie
        Mar 2016
        #480
      
        
        I approve of these short-term changes and look forward to seeing what's coming.
        ellisonz
        Mar 2016
        #490
      
        
        I -really- don't think you've thought through removing the 5-hide thing...
        Decoy of Fenris
        Mar 2016
        #504
      
        
        Ok, I'll bite. I see three posts on which the alert clearly had some merit.
        redgreenandblue
        Mar 2016
        #609
      
        
        Not proud of that. Not walking it back though, either. Let's use it as an example, though.
        Decoy of Fenris
        Mar 2016
        #516
      
        
        Thank you for avoiding the usual HRC supporter smugness and contempt... it is appreciated..
        modestybl
        Mar 2016
        #512
      
        
        I can name more than 2 people who have earned their 90 day vacations they gotten
        LostOne4Ever
        Mar 2016
        #537
      
        
        Possibly the most short-sighted move since the implementation of the jury system....
        truebrit71
        Mar 2016
        #563
      
        
        So, what you are saying is that maybe posters were right about jury issues all along?
        The Straight Story
        Mar 2016
        #595
      
        
        Wow, you are sooo smart! And guess what, they are pretty big and get lots of posts too
        The Straight Story
        Mar 2016
        #613
      
        
        And that means....what? Just trying to stir up things aren't you? Awww poor pinto
        The Straight Story
        Mar 2016
        #626
      
        
        hillary may have the votes but Bernie definitely has the crowds, caucuses and Internet.
        Mary Mac
        May 2016
        #651
      
        
        Well, if he's winning the signs, the SDs should really consider changing their vote from
        zappaman
        May 2016
        #652
      
        
        What if we see someone who is real new to DU who are using Trump talking points?
        redstatebluegirl
        May 2016
        #653
      
  