Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(63,767 posts)
16. Oh, and in case you were wondering - it's a non-binding resolution - they'll "reconsider" it
Thu Jun 1, 2017, 09:34 AM
Jun 2017

EDIT

A few days in advance of today’s vote, Exxon tried to turn the tide of opinion among investors. According to CNBC, “Exxon had stepped up efforts to persuade investors to vote against climate-related proposals at Wednesday’s annual meeting with a campaign of calling, writing, and lobbying shareholders in person.”

Exxon has insisted that it already provides the relevant information to investors.

The investor resolution is non-binding. In an e-mail to Ars, Exxon media relations manager Alan T. Jeffers noted that the company’s chairman, Darren Woods, said the company would “consider all feedback from our shareholders.”

“Those votes receiving a majority level of support will be reconsidered by the board,” Jeffers added.

EDIT

https://arstechnica.com/business/2017/05/exxon-investors-clash-with-executives-vote-in-favor-of-annual-climate-report/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh yes malaise May 2017 #1
Wow Ohioblue22 May 2017 #2
K&R smirkymonkey May 2017 #3
K&R... spanone May 2017 #4
Shareholders need to know if their investment is sound gratuitous May 2017 #5
Not a Trivial Point modrepub May 2017 #7
This is why they want in on the Russian Arctic oil... Wounded Bear May 2017 #12
Wow! Good for those shareholders. It's about time. CaliforniaPeggy May 2017 #6
Given that shareholder resolutions are non-binding mythology May 2017 #8
Awesome!! Thank you for sharing! bresue May 2017 #9
WOW. Sugar Smack May 2017 #10
29 years since the signal went up . . . hatrack May 2017 #11
K & R BadgerMom May 2017 #13
Double WOW!! Duppers May 2017 #14
Resistance is NOT futile central scrutinizer May 2017 #15
Oh, and in case you were wondering - it's a non-binding resolution - they'll "reconsider" it hatrack Jun 2017 #16
Thanks for posting! I was trying to figure this out. BigmanPigman Jun 2017 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Exxon's Shareholders Just...»Reply #16