Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: N.J. Forces Mom to Pay Son's Student Loans: Murder 'Does Not Meet Threshold for Loan Forgiveness' [View all]kag
(4,186 posts)67. I'm curious...
I haven't read the whole article yet, but I'm curious if this decision is appealable to the U.S. Supreme Court. Because while I understand the concept of cosigning, what is obvious is that she can no longer reap the benefits of what she "bought" with the loaned money.
I'm not a lawyer, and I'm sure it's just my sympathy for her showing through (my hubby and I are about to cosign a lease for our kids), but I am curious about the option of appealing this ruling.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

N.J. Forces Mom to Pay Son's Student Loans: Murder 'Does Not Meet Threshold for Loan Forgiveness' [View all]
Night Watchman
Jul 2016
OP
Murder should be enough of a reason to drop loan charges, even after the fact. That mother should
downeastdaniel
Jul 2016
#78
If you co-sign any loan, you are still responsible if the other signer dies or becomes incapacitated
thesquanderer
Jul 2016
#6
If you don't want to be responsible for a debt, don't sign for it. Is that unreasonable? (n/t)
thesquanderer
Jul 2016
#79
Yes. If there are assets in the estate to cover the deceased's debts........
WillowTree
Jul 2016
#24
Sadly, I learned this last October. But as an only child, it didn't matter; her "estate" was mine.
WinkyDink
Jul 2016
#102
Only out of the estate or if the heir(s) co-signed for the debt when it was incurred.
WillowTree
Jul 2016
#25
I think that's because the article's explanation focuses on the systemic explanation
kcr
Jul 2016
#57
Of course she's responsible for the balance of the loan that she co-signed. Why wouldn't she be?
WillowTree
Jul 2016
#26
The article says she can repay it without being too financially affected. She is complaining
Yo_Mama
Jul 2016
#40
Sadly I'm not surprised. It's a fuck off I've got mine and this doesn't affect me kind of country.
onecaliberal
Jul 2016
#31
It's a fuck off I've got mine and this doesn't affect me kind of country.
SammyWinstonJack
Jul 2016
#49
When student loans were dischargeable in BK, it was commonplace for people who could repay
Yo_Mama
Jul 2016
#46
I agree. People who see nothing wrong here because it's a matter of "Paperwork"
BlancheSplanchnik
Jul 2016
#64
It a legal issue for some of us. You signed a contract. What happened isn't the lender's problem.
Shrike47
Jul 2016
#103
She took out the loan too. That's what cosigning is. If she hadn't signed for the loan,
Yo_Mama
Jul 2016
#43
The "man’s killing remains unsolved", and it was "likely tied to drugs." So state the police...
xocet
Jul 2016
#77
What makes you think that anything is ever "free"? Huge myth. Someone always has to pay. Always.
WillowTree
Jul 2016
#98