General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I do not want Hillary Clinton to be the Democratic nominee. [View all]wyldwolf
(43,891 posts)In my oversized edition of Audacity of Hope:
Pg.8-9
Examples of "New Democrat speak."
pg. 10
Obama expresses centrist/DLC beliefs on free market competition. He states his feeling that many government programs (social programs) have not worked as advertised.
pg. 11
Obama rejects special interests, or single issue, politics based on race, gender, sexual orientation, or victimhood - one of the purpose of the DLC. "Common good." Bill Clinton.
pg. 20
Despite Barbara Boxer signing on to Rep. Stepanie Tubbs Jones' challenge of the 2004 presidential election, Obama votes to certify it, believing Bush won the election despite evidence of voter fraud in Ohio.
Pg. 23
Obama recognizes the global war on terrorism is real, and not a "bumpersticker slogan." But he calls it a "the battle against international terrorism," one he believes should be addressed both by dealing with global poverty and a "judicious projection of military power."
Pg.24
Though he admits he believes Democratic ideology is more grounded in fact than that of the GOP, Obama expresses disdain for the conspiracy theories of the fringes, "of America being hijacked by an evil cabal." He says the left and right have become "mirror images of each other," whose purpose is "not to pursuade the other side but to keep their bases agitated and assured of the rightness of their respective causes."
pg. 31
Obama says liberals of the 60s/70s valued entitlements over duties and responsibilities.
----------------
He uses the Bush administrations tough language to talk about national security in the age of terrorism (if we have to go it alone, the American people stand ready to pay any price and bear any burden to protect our country)
He assails President Bush for waging an unnecessary and misguided war in Iraq and for promoting an Ownership Society that magnifies the uneven risks and rewards of todays winner-take-all economy. Yet he also takes the Democrats to task for becoming the party of reaction: In reaction to a war that is ill-conceived, we appear suspicious of all military action. In reaction to those who proclaim the market can cure all ills, we resist efforts to use market principles to tackle pressing problems. In reaction to religious overreach, we equate tolerance with secularism and forfeit the moral language that would help infuse our policies with a larger meaning. We lose elections and hope for the courts to foil Republican plans. We lose the courts and wait for a White House scandal.
His thoughts on domestic and foreign policy try to hew to this consensus-building line. Some of his recommendations devolve into little more than fuzzy statements of the obvious: i.e., that Americas addiction to oil is affecting the economy and undermining national security, or that the education system needs to be revamped and improved. Others echo Bill Clintons third way, methodically triangulating between traditionally conservative and traditionally liberal ideas.
Mr. Obama writes that conservatives and Bill Clinton were right about welfare as it was previously structured: By detaching income from work and by making no demands on welfare recipients other than a tolerance for intrusive bureaucracy and an assurance that no man lived in the same house as the mother of his children, the old A.F.D.C. program sapped people of their initiative and eroded their self respect.
SO much more from his book which is the most eloquently written Third Way manifesto ever.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):