Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

marmar

(78,874 posts)
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 11:49 AM Feb 2015

Juan Cole: Is ISIL’s ‘Shock and Awe’ more Awe-ful because One Victim? [View all]


Is ISIL’s ‘Shock and Awe’ more Awe-ful because One Victim?
By Juan Cole | Feb. 5, 2015


The Daesh (ISIL or ISIS) burning of a captured Jordanian pilot alive produced justified revulsion globally, resulting in the terrorist organization being termed “barbarous” and similar epithets. Why did it behave this way? Because it wants to terrify its opponents into submission and underline that it is too crazy to be messed with. In short, it was a form of ‘shock and awe.’ It was all the more horrible for being inflicted on a single, known individual with a premeditated and inexorable viciousness, and for being carefully filmed and shared on the internet (successfully tempting Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News into rebroadcasting it).

“Shock and Awe” was the slogan pushed by the Bush administration for its massive bombing campaign against Iraq in March-April of 2003. It conducted 29,200 air strikes in the course of the initial invasion. Many of those missions were flown against what turned out to be empty Baath government facilities in hopes of killing high government officials (mostly that did not happen). But you can’t drop 500-pound bombs on a densely populated city without killing innocent bystanders. Likely the first two months of US bombing left at the very least 2,760 civilians dead.*

A study based on the conservative “Iraq Body Count” found that in Iraq, “46 per cent of the victims of US air strikes whose gender could be determined were female and 39 per cent were children.”

But the slaughter from the air was great not only among civilians but among military personnel, many of whom had no opportunity to surrender or run away (when US ground forces approaching the capital were surprised to come upon elements of a Republican Guard tank division they thought had been destroyed, the Iraqi tank personnel exited their vehicles and decamped en masse; those discovered by A-10 tank killers or Apache helicopters were not afforded that opportunity).

Speaking of burning people alive, one technique the US used was the BLU-82B, a 15,000 pound bomb detonated near the ground with a blast radius of about 5000 feet, but leaving no crater. It was intended to intimidate by burning up large numbers of infantrymen or armored personnel. (It is sometimes misidentified as a fuel-air bomb or ‘daisy cutter’ but is much more powerful than the latter). It was retired in 2008 in favor of something even more destructive. ................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.juancole.com/2015/02/shock-because-victim.html



29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
if one dies it's a tragedy... magical thyme Feb 2015 #1
I have it in my sig line. valerief Feb 2015 #7
actually I was thinking of Stalin magical thyme Feb 2015 #15
I was thinking similar NewJeffCT Feb 2015 #18
Yes, because anything worth saying has been said many times before, like Kennedy's, valerief Feb 2015 #21
Bush's invasion of Iraq was a war of aggression and a crime arely staircase Feb 2015 #2
Kick. polly7 Feb 2015 #3
Or the fake body counts from 'nam erronis Feb 2015 #23
K&R JEB Feb 2015 #4
His questions make some people uncomfortable and include facts about policies and Jefferson23 Feb 2015 #5
And many Americans just don't want to hear it...... marmar Feb 2015 #6
Jingoism works! valerief Feb 2015 #9
What Cole has said and I will add, what Obama has said recently, can get in the way Jefferson23 Feb 2015 #19
What's his point? nt Dreamer Tatum Feb 2015 #8
I believe it's this, and that what has, and is being done in the name of polly7 Feb 2015 #10
Stipulated. Can we DO something now? Dreamer Tatum Feb 2015 #13
It isn't Cole that has to do something. polly7 Feb 2015 #17
K&R G_j Feb 2015 #11
Sick irony is that ISIS' actions are used by the US as justification for more aerial bombing. nt Romulox Feb 2015 #12
Academic and moral arguments about our past deeds are valid. TwilightGardener Feb 2015 #14
Dear Juan, it's not 'one victim' B2G Feb 2015 #16
Such as this from of all places, RT: 7962 Feb 2015 #25
Yes, it is. Anyone who can look someone if the face and burn him to death is a psychopath. McCamy Taylor Feb 2015 #20
This point needs repeating killbotfactory Feb 2015 #22
Bullshit equivalency. But then juan Cole is full of shit anyway, so what else would he say 7962 Feb 2015 #24
We weren't shown video of women and children in Falluja Warpy Feb 2015 #26
+1. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2015 #27
Exactly, Warpy. polly7 Feb 2015 #29
Aljazeera: If terror is political theatre, ISIL is an Oscar winner pampango Feb 2015 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Juan Cole: Is ISIL’s ‘Sho...