Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Juan Cole: Is ISIL’s ‘Shock and Awe’ more Awe-ful because One Victim? [View all]
Is ISILs Shock and Awe more Awe-ful because One Victim?
By Juan Cole | Feb. 5, 2015
The Daesh (ISIL or ISIS) burning of a captured Jordanian pilot alive produced justified revulsion globally, resulting in the terrorist organization being termed barbarous and similar epithets. Why did it behave this way? Because it wants to terrify its opponents into submission and underline that it is too crazy to be messed with. In short, it was a form of shock and awe. It was all the more horrible for being inflicted on a single, known individual with a premeditated and inexorable viciousness, and for being carefully filmed and shared on the internet (successfully tempting Rupert Murdochs Fox News into rebroadcasting it).
Shock and Awe was the slogan pushed by the Bush administration for its massive bombing campaign against Iraq in March-April of 2003. It conducted 29,200 air strikes in the course of the initial invasion. Many of those missions were flown against what turned out to be empty Baath government facilities in hopes of killing high government officials (mostly that did not happen). But you cant drop 500-pound bombs on a densely populated city without killing innocent bystanders. Likely the first two months of US bombing left at the very least 2,760 civilians dead.*
A study based on the conservative Iraq Body Count found that in Iraq, 46 per cent of the victims of US air strikes whose gender could be determined were female and 39 per cent were children.
But the slaughter from the air was great not only among civilians but among military personnel, many of whom had no opportunity to surrender or run away (when US ground forces approaching the capital were surprised to come upon elements of a Republican Guard tank division they thought had been destroyed, the Iraqi tank personnel exited their vehicles and decamped en masse; those discovered by A-10 tank killers or Apache helicopters were not afforded that opportunity).
Speaking of burning people alive, one technique the US used was the BLU-82B, a 15,000 pound bomb detonated near the ground with a blast radius of about 5000 feet, but leaving no crater. It was intended to intimidate by burning up large numbers of infantrymen or armored personnel. (It is sometimes misidentified as a fuel-air bomb or daisy cutter but is much more powerful than the latter). It was retired in 2008 in favor of something even more destructive. ................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.juancole.com/2015/02/shock-because-victim.html
29 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Yes, because anything worth saying has been said many times before, like Kennedy's,
valerief
Feb 2015
#21
His questions make some people uncomfortable and include facts about policies and
Jefferson23
Feb 2015
#5
What Cole has said and I will add, what Obama has said recently, can get in the way
Jefferson23
Feb 2015
#19
Sick irony is that ISIS' actions are used by the US as justification for more aerial bombing. nt
Romulox
Feb 2015
#12
Yes, it is. Anyone who can look someone if the face and burn him to death is a psychopath.
McCamy Taylor
Feb 2015
#20