General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: DAY AFTER: Religious Leaders Send Letter To Obama Ask For Exemption From Discriminating Against LGBT [View all]Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Bush v Gore and start blaming those events too. But that would be absurd. Bush v Gore did not establish a legal precedent, this decision did. The scope of these two decisions are entirely different.
Bush v Gore intervened in a presidential election, and was an outrage, but that decision established no new constitutional law. Sure you can go ahead and blame everything else that happened afterwards on that decision including hobby lobby, but again, that is a bit ridiculous, and is outside the scope of constitutional law. You might as well go back and blame it all on Marbury v. Madison 'cause without that there would be no Bush v Gore.
Hobby Lobby has set new law, it has, although limited for now, turned the first amendment on its head with respect to religious freedom and individual rights, establishing for the first time a right to impose religious beliefs on others.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):