Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cheyanne

(733 posts)
16. A memorial for the dead is usually considered
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 11:31 AM
Mar 2014

spiritually oriented, even though it may not reference the particulars of that spirituality.

However, in a nation that is built on the concept of freedom of religion, to specifically reference one religion, at one site that is set up as a national memorial, devalues other points of view.

I think that atheists should be allowed to contribute and show their communiality (is there such a word?) along with everyone else.

Since the cross is a recognizable symbol of a particular religion, I understand the atheists' desire to have a recognizable presence at the site.

Here is part of the mission statement:

The Museum honors the nearly 3,000 victims of these attacks and all those who risked their lives to save others. It further recognizes the thousands who survived and all who demonstrated extraordinary compassion in the aftermath.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I may be off base here, but handmade34 Mar 2014 #1
thank you for the correction. cheyanne Mar 2014 #14
, blkmusclmachine Mar 2014 #2
I have to agree marions ghost Mar 2014 #3
You said it very well when you called it a missed opportunity. Bonobo Mar 2014 #4
Right, it's a very disingenous argument to say marions ghost Mar 2014 #10
I think there is already a bunch of other wreckage in the museum goldent Mar 2014 #6
Semantics marions ghost Mar 2014 #11
Isn't the vast majority of what is at the site... Lost_Count Mar 2014 #5
Do you need something that declares that it is specifically for Christians? LostOne4Ever Mar 2014 #8
I certainly don't... Lost_Count Mar 2014 #9
Good question to ask the museum LostOne4Ever Mar 2014 #12
A memorial for the dead is usually considered cheyanne Mar 2014 #16
There were over 90 nationalities represented, Lars39 Mar 2014 #7
Do we really agree with this? marions ghost Mar 2014 #13
Yes, it would have been best to not have a particular religious symbol at cheyanne Mar 2014 #17
I said I support the Atheist action on this marions ghost Mar 2014 #22
It should include all religious symbols, or none. Vashta Nerada Mar 2014 #15
No, that wasn't the reason. Beacool Mar 2014 #18
This is a profound photo marions ghost Mar 2014 #20
It'll be a shrine only to those who choose to pray to it. Beacool Mar 2014 #21
Sorry to disagree marions ghost Mar 2014 #23
Well, what can I say? Beacool Mar 2014 #25
yeah, to hell with jewish and islamic families of 9/11 victims unblock Mar 2014 #27
Oh please, the drama. Beacool Mar 2014 #29
It's a missed opportunity marions ghost Mar 2014 #28
Think what you want, but I don't see any problem with this artifact. Beacool Mar 2014 #30
I have no problem with it displayed as an historical artifact marions ghost Mar 2014 #31
"God Bless our Fallen Brothers" Arugula Latte Mar 2014 #24
It's a question of faith. Beacool Mar 2014 #26
Multiple wrongs don't make a right. Other religions are just as stupid as Christianity cthulu2016 Mar 2014 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»beyond that cross at grou...»Reply #16