General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Not "what it's like", as I said, I have yet to see an example of that. Nobody says that, that I have seen. But if they did, it would be ok unless over the ToS line, it would just be SILLY. It probably wouldn't be taken very seriously, I don't think outrage about it would be necessary. But then, this is hypothetical.
Is "excoriating" what you're intending to do to disagreement on feminist issues? Is that some kind of standard to be upheld or matched with the others you mentioned?
If excoriating is the intended response to disagreement, then it's no mystery why there is so much nasty contention on these subjects. Clearly, it's the goal. I think that is pretty much the definition of a "disruptor" though, and not allowed under the rules.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):