Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
38. I guess then progressives need to find another candidate they can coalesce around in 2016
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 09:40 AM
Nov 2013
Names and personalities are relatively unimportant - What matters is that there is at last one serious and viable candidate who will champion progressive issues and raise the progressive flag in 2016.

Here is one possibility - one I would actually prefer - Sen. Sanders indicates he would run if no one else were willing to champion the main progressive issues - If Sen. Warren is not running - then quite likely no will be championing progressive issues.

Sanders for President?: He says there's a 1 percent chance he'll run in 2016 - Video

Sanders for President?: He says there's a 1 percent chance he'll run in 2016 as a way to force the country's prospective leaders into a debate over the share of wealth going to America's top 1 percent. “I worry very much that those issues are not being discussed,” Sanders told WCAX-TV. "That is the most important domestic issue that we have got to talk about." Sanders cited a lack of jobs for young adults and a rising percentage of the country slipping into poverty, but said he'll only run if no one else is willing to champion those issues

WCAX-BUR (CBS) - Burlington, VT
Channel 3 News at Eleven

VIDEO AND TRANSCRIPT:

http://mms.tveyes.com/Transcript.asp?StationID=1660&DateTime=11%2F8%2F2013+11%3A01%3A07+PM&Term=%22Bernie+Sanders%22&PlayClip=TRUE

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

She knows what she wants. And it's not the Presidency, or Vice Presidency. CaliforniaPeggy Nov 2013 #1
You make a good point. She does know what she wants. Laelth Nov 2013 #36
I missed the part where she said she wouldn't run if drafted. Scuba Nov 2013 #2
Lol! stevenleser Nov 2013 #3
Did you really think she'd say 'yes'? Scuba Nov 2013 #10
It means she isn't running. She didn't use wiggle room terminology stevenleser Nov 2013 #15
You read a lot more into her statement than many. And it's a woman's prerogative to change her mind Scuba Nov 2013 #27
In 2006, Obama was still denying any intention to run in '08. Jackpine Radical Nov 2013 #4
"Denying intent" is not equal to "I am not running" stevenleser Nov 2013 #5
No way can Hillary excite progressives, regardless of who she might pick for VP. Scuba Nov 2013 #12
That's your opinion based on your own feelings only. Nt stevenleser Nov 2013 #16
Yep, I'm the only one here. Yeah, that's it. Scuba Nov 2013 #24
You can't speak for all or even most progressives. Nt stevenleser Nov 2013 #26
And you don't speak for Elizabeth Warren. Scuba Nov 2013 #28
Unlike you, I didn't claim to. She spoke for herself in a video stevenleser Nov 2013 #29
Post removed Post removed Nov 2013 #30
So, you're saying that Warren is as much a political sellout as Obama is, right? brooklynite Nov 2013 #34
I'm wondering what the earliest time to announce is on the record? Whisp Nov 2013 #6
If a candidate says "I'm not running, go do something else" it matters stevenleser Nov 2013 #7
Obama announced VERY early. hedda_foil Nov 2013 #19
thanks steve. pitting ms warren against ms clinton is totally counter productive spanone Nov 2013 #8
Thank you, Senator. longship Nov 2013 #9
so did Barack Obama back in 2006 or 7. nt LaydeeBug Nov 2013 #11
No, he didn't. Nt stevenleser Nov 2013 #14
YES, he did. LaydeeBug Nov 2013 #23
You said 2006-2007. He declared in 2007. Nt stevenleser Nov 2013 #25
No. I said 2006 **OR** 2007, and he said he wasn't in 2006. YOU'RE WELCOME. nt LaydeeBug Nov 2013 #31
EW knows she can probably be more productive where she is. nt Tarheel_Dem Nov 2013 #13
Why does that make some posters so pleased. Union Scribe Nov 2013 #17
She is a great lady. William769 Nov 2013 #18
Exactly. stevenleser Nov 2013 #21
Watch while I yawn. RagAss Nov 2013 #20
Folks, getting mad at me won't make Warren run. It won't change reality. stevenleser Nov 2013 #22
Okay, but I will not move on to Hillary. nt Demo_Chris Nov 2013 #32
Post removed Post removed Nov 2013 #33
Townhall.com, really? NuclearDem Nov 2013 #41
I *am* not running for President MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #35
Good! Now we can lockdown HRC and move on to the Senate... bluedeathray Nov 2013 #37
I guess then progressives need to find another candidate they can coalesce around in 2016 Douglas Carpenter Nov 2013 #38
If not Warren, then whom? Laelth Nov 2013 #39
Too bad. Hopefully, there will still be a liberal/progressive challenger to Hillary. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2013 #40
still a year away tina tron Nov 2013 #42
While I would vote for her in the primary.... NCTraveler Nov 2013 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Video: Elizabeth Warren d...»Reply #38