Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Video: Elizabeth Warren definitively declares she is not running for President in 2016 [View all]longship
(40,416 posts)9. Thank you, Senator.
I love Elizabeth Warren. I think that she will end up being a great US Senator. If people would only get off her case about running for president, maybe she could spend more of her considerable intellect and energies on achieving that goal instead of wasting her time talking about the fact that she has no aspirations of running for national office.
I suspect, however, that the Warren 2016 threads will continue unabated.
Do people understand that we need US Senators like her as much or more than we need somebody like her in the White House? Do people not understand the concept of three branches in our government?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Video: Elizabeth Warren definitively declares she is not running for President in 2016 [View all]
stevenleser
Nov 2013
OP
She knows what she wants. And it's not the Presidency, or Vice Presidency.
CaliforniaPeggy
Nov 2013
#1
You read a lot more into her statement than many. And it's a woman's prerogative to change her mind
Scuba
Nov 2013
#27
So, you're saying that Warren is as much a political sellout as Obama is, right?
brooklynite
Nov 2013
#34
thanks steve. pitting ms warren against ms clinton is totally counter productive
spanone
Nov 2013
#8
No. I said 2006 **OR** 2007, and he said he wasn't in 2006. YOU'RE WELCOME. nt
LaydeeBug
Nov 2013
#31
I guess then progressives need to find another candidate they can coalesce around in 2016
Douglas Carpenter
Nov 2013
#38
Too bad. Hopefully, there will still be a liberal/progressive challenger to Hillary.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Nov 2013
#40