Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
3. U.S. nuclear plants also exceeding safety limits with spent fuel pools/fuel rods.
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 06:59 AM
Nov 2013

Last edited Mon Nov 4, 2013, 03:01 PM - Edit history (1)

The United States has 31 boiling water reactors (BWR) with pools elevated several stories above ground, similar to those at the Fukushima Dai-Ichi station. As in Japan, all spent fuel pools at nuclear power plants do not have steel-lined, concrete barriers that cover reactor vessels to prevent the escape of radioactivity. They are not required to have back-up generators to keep used fuel rods cool, if offsite power is lost. The 69 Pressurized Water (PWR) reactors operating in the U.S. do not have elevated pools, and also lack proper containment and several have large cavities beneath them which could exacerbate leakage. http://www.ips-dc.org/reports/spent_nuclear_fuel_pools_in_the_us_reducing_the_deadly_risks_of_storage

Spent Nuclear Fuel Pools in the U.S.: Reducing the Deadly Risks of Storage
www.ips-dc.org
The price of fixing America's nuclear vulnerabilities may be high, but the price of doing too little is incalculable.

In a recent interview with The Real News Network, Robert Alvarez, a nuclear policy specialist since 1975, reports that spent nuclear fuel in the United States comprises the largest concentration of radioactivity on the planet: 71,000 metric tons. Worse, since the Yucca Mountain waste repository has been scrapped due to its proximity to active faults (see last image), the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission has allowed reactor operators to store four times more waste in the spent fuel pools than they’re designed to handle. http://coto2.wordpress.com/2011/03/26/us-stores-spent-nuclear-fuel-rods-at-4-times-pool-capacity/
US stores spent nuclear fuel rods at 4 times pool capacity

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Inexcuseable that there is no global invovlement. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2013 #1
Japan has rejected help then accepted help. Sending mixed signals. Katashi_itto Nov 2013 #2
Well that is no longer true... Bennyboy Nov 2013 #52
U.S. nuclear plants also exceeding safety limits with spent fuel pools/fuel rods. Divernan Nov 2013 #3
+100 Katashi_itto Nov 2013 #4
Disgraceful that this thread is being ignored on DU Divernan Nov 2013 #5
It is sort of incredible isn't it? Katashi_itto Nov 2013 #6
well, maybe so justabob Nov 2013 #12
The world cannot afford to take a fatalistic view of this catastrophe. Divernan Nov 2013 #14
Obama continues to push for new nuclear plants without a solution to disposal of spent fuel rods. Divernan Nov 2013 #15
I get it, and I do not disagree justabob Nov 2013 #17
Fuku is ignored regularly nadinbrzezinski Nov 2013 #16
It is "ignored" regularly because of many reasons Art_from_Ark Nov 2013 #19
I think there is ONE DU'er that I think is closer than you nadinbrzezinski Nov 2013 #20
I think I am the closest Art_from_Ark Nov 2013 #22
I know, I tend to go to worst case scenarios nadinbrzezinski Nov 2013 #23
If something really bad happens, Art_from_Ark Nov 2013 #26
In the recent past I have been pushing people to get a darn cute nadinbrzezinski Nov 2013 #28
Art is closer than me and he is right. Bonobo Nov 2013 #30
In the end hope is all there is left nadinbrzezinski Nov 2013 #31
Yeah, that's about it, Nadin. Bonobo Nov 2013 #33
And I worry about you like family! Generic Other Nov 2013 #39
Believe me, I'm no fan of nuclear power Art_from_Ark Nov 2013 #42
No damage from the typhoon Generic Other Nov 2013 #46
I can understand that Art_from_Ark Nov 2013 #47
Can you speak Japanese? Art_from_Ark Nov 2013 #48
Perhaps it is being ignored... LouisvilleDem Nov 2013 #24
Good info, Katashi_itto. Efilroft Sul Nov 2013 #7
The zircalloy only ignites over a certain temperature in air. AtheistCrusader Nov 2013 #8
I posted that here too on multimedia Katashi_itto Nov 2013 #9
Yes it will heat up. AtheistCrusader Nov 2013 #11
Agree, that is the big "unknown" at least given TEPCO track record I would be highly worried about Katashi_itto Nov 2013 #13
K&R pa28 Nov 2013 #10
Effects of radiation CC22 Nov 2013 #18
I am totally completely 100 percent against using the splitting of atoms to boil water madokie Nov 2013 #36
What about in space travel? Gravitycollapse Nov 2013 #43
I guess that would be fine with me as I don't see much of a down side to that madokie Nov 2013 #44
You realize solar energy is simply a method of collecting energy... Gravitycollapse Nov 2013 #45
welcome to DU gopiscrap Nov 2013 #40
k/r marmar Nov 2013 #21
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Nov 2013 #25
What Divernan posted up above about the ever escalating cost of keeping nuclear safe... Benton D Struckcheon Nov 2013 #27
CROSS POSTED TO THE "fUKUSHIMA NEWS" THREAD... Bennyboy Nov 2013 #29
The big problem is that leaving the fuel rods where they are is not an option. longship Nov 2013 #32
Agree! Katashi_itto Nov 2013 #34
This is an important story. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #35
I think what significant is TEPCOs trying to mainly "go it alone" Katashi_itto Nov 2013 #37
Japanese people trust Japan with Japanese issues. Bonobo Nov 2013 #49
I've no problem with that under normal circumstances. But this is in a different sphere entirely. Katashi_itto Nov 2013 #50
No longer true..... Bennyboy Nov 2013 #53
The inevitable consequence of nuclear power... 99Forever Nov 2013 #38
I know a bunch of Tea Partiers we could volunteer .... Myrina Nov 2013 #41
FUKUSHIMA: TEPCO, helped by the U.S., to remove nuclear fuel rods Bennyboy Nov 2013 #51
Not surprising, really LittleBlue Nov 2013 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Apocalyptic" F...»Reply #3