Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
41. Crime is your word - that is not the word I used
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 06:48 PM
Oct 2013

I said reason and I did identify a reason. Go back and re-read.

I am kind of done with this.

Sam

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

But isn't that what the Tea Party racists want to happen so their wet dreams of impeachment can diabeticman Oct 2013 #1
It could possibly be more than that Samantha Oct 2013 #3
Obama won't do anything without the blessings of the Congressional GOP. blkmusclmachine Oct 2013 #2
Nope. This cuts to Constitutional powers. By that metric alone, the US House owns this. longship Oct 2013 #4
You do not think he has the power to declare a national emergency? (n/t) Samantha Oct 2013 #5
Well, that's arguable. longship Oct 2013 #6
I just was not sure if you had eliminated the premise of the thread by your response Samantha Oct 2013 #7
Well, impeachment is an important issue. longship Oct 2013 #10
That's the important question. longship Oct 2013 #8
The problem is that even if he declared an emergency and directed the Treasury pnwmom Oct 2013 #9
Even if that were to happen (and I did hear him discuss this) Samantha Oct 2013 #11
Yes. It could be his only option. n/t pnwmom Oct 2013 #12
I am going to save this research in case we need to look at it again Samantha Oct 2013 #13
I agree, the bottom line is the market uncertainty treestar Oct 2013 #15
He would not have to use the 14th amendment but he could if he chose to do so Samantha Oct 2013 #19
I kind of like the idea of using the Sept. 11 terrorism emergency treestar Oct 2013 #14
You and I are thinking the same thing Samantha Oct 2013 #18
It takes 2 to stalemate Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #21
What if one side is engaged in the same sort of activity that a declared enemy has perpetrated? Samantha Oct 2013 #26
How can it collapse the economy if the stalemate is lifted? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #29
I have no power in the US Government so that second sentence is ridiculous Samantha Oct 2013 #33
I think you understand well enough my intent with my second sentence. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #36
Under what conditions would the SOE be lifted? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #16
The terms for this are outlined in the Constitution Samantha Oct 2013 #17
So a president gets to unilaterally abrogate congessional power Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #20
It is not convenient at all -- it is the deliberate safety net built into our legal system Samantha Oct 2013 #22
We may be in a "Global War on Terror" (what a joke so-called "Progressives" now applaud this) Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #25
By the way, this is not a "scheme" Samantha Oct 2013 #27
"The National Emergencies Act requires the president to specify the provisions in the law" Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #30
I covered that in the thread Samantha Oct 2013 #32
What underlying violation of law could occur by congress exercise its constitutional power? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #35
You are not discussing the true bigger picture -- that is what I am doing Samantha Oct 2013 #37
Your page is irrelevant, taken from a non-existent book. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #38
There is no trumping involved - the National Emergency Act does not violate the Constitution Samantha Oct 2013 #39
If we have to accrue new debt to pay old debt then we are bankrupt and the debt limit is irrelevant. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #40
Crime is your word - that is not the word I used Samantha Oct 2013 #41
Do you not think the President should abrograte congressional power when Samantha Oct 2013 #23
Simple answer -- NO Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #24
You exaggerate Samantha Oct 2013 #28
Congress didn't fail anything, anymore than the President failed to sign their bill. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #31
Congress' failure is a matter of continuing debate by the Constitutional experts Samantha Oct 2013 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Declaration of a State of...»Reply #41