Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
4. While they worry about their partner's purity, they miss what is happening to the nation.
Mon Mar 5, 2012, 10:34 AM
Mar 2012

Last edited Mon Mar 5, 2012, 11:12 AM - Edit history (1)

The Amazing Vanishing Act: Accounting Control Fraud Disappears from the Regulatory Lexicon

by William K. Black
Benzinga.com

Criminologists know that accounting control fraud causes greater financial losses than all other forms of property crime – combined.

Some of the world’s best economists, George Akerlof and Paul Romer, praised the S&L regulators’ early recognition of these frauds and set out a formal economic theory of accounting control fraud (“Looting: the Economic Underworld of Bankruptcy for Profit”). They ended their 1993 article with this paragraph, in order to emphasize its importance.

“Neither the public nor economists foresaw that (S&L deregulation was) bound to produce looting. Nor, unaware of the concept, could they have known how serious it would be. Thus the regulators in the field who understood what was happening from the beginning found lukewarm support, at best, for their cause. Now we know better. If we learn from experience, history need not repeat itself.”

The primary reasons that accounting control fraud can produce catastrophic losses are the seeming legitimacy of the firm, the supreme status and respectability of the CEO leading the fraud, the fact that accounting control fraud is a “sure thing” (Akerlof & Romer 1993), the ability of control fraud to hyper-inflate bubbles, allowing the fraud to persist for years and magnify losses, and the paradox that the optimal means for a fraudulent CEO to loot “his” bank is to cause the bank to make exceptionally bad loans.

The last element is so counter-intuitive that despite the accounting control frauds’ dominant role in driving the S&L debacle and the Enron-era accounting control frauds many people cannot really believe that elite CEOs would loot “their” banks despite the many felony convictions of the elite CEOs that drove the two predecessor crises.

CONTINUED... http://www.benzinga.com/general/psychology/12/02/2355842/the-amazing-vanishing-act-accounting-control-fraud-disappears-from-

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Have YOU taken the Pledge? [View all] Octafish Mar 2012 OP
How it should be: lastlib Mar 2012 #1
That's where the 'Socialism' comes in. Octafish Mar 2012 #3
The typical Repub retort:: WingDinger Mar 2012 #2
While they worry about their partner's purity, they miss what is happening to the nation. Octafish Mar 2012 #4
Damn skippy! raouldukelives Mar 2012 #5
Integrity Octafish Mar 2012 #6
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Have YOU taken the Pledge...»Reply #4