Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

soundsgreat

(125 posts)
9. More detailed article here
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 03:28 AM
Sep 2013

Defense attorneys for the surviving suspect in the Boston marathon bombings said Monday, Sept. 23, they will ask for more evidence from prosecutors before the attorney general makes a decision on whether or not to recommend the death penalty.

At a status conference inside the Moakley District Courthouse in Boston, defense attorney Miriam Conrad said the evidence provided so far – which includes “a large amount of digital evidence, including videos and computer and telephone hard-drives” – is missing interviews and grand jury testimony from family members that might aid the defense’s case.

“We do plan to deliver to the government, hopefully by the end of the business day today, a detailed discovery request letter,” Conrad said. “But, that is not going to be the end all be all in the discovery requests for this case.”

Conrad said “extensive redactions” in evidence were “unnecessary” and the defense team believes the government is withholding evidence that might help their client.


http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x511627772/Tsarnaevs-lawyers-ask-for-more-info-before-death-penalty-decision#ixzz2fnA6F1pR


Reading the Boston Herald, you might believe the lawyers want more evidence only to save DT from the death penalty. Maybe I’m wrong, but this article seems to tell a different story. It looks like the lawyers demand evidence for the guilt question in general BEFORE talking about the death penalty.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tsarnaev lawyers: " ...»Reply #9