Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Feds tell Web firms to turn over user account passwords [View all]DevonRex
(22,541 posts)73. The author is a global warming denier, libertarian economist, Carnegie Melon grad.
http://beta.mediamatters.org/research/2009/06/29/reporting-on-possibly-suppressed-epa-document-c/151642
"Reporting on possibly "suppressed" EPA document, CBS suppressed actual climate science
CBSNews.com uncritically reported an internal EPA document's false claim that "global temperatures have declined for 11 years."
In a June 26 CBSNews.com article reporting that the Environmental Protection Agency "may have suppressed" an internal report on climate change, senior correspondent Declan McCullagh uncritically reported the document's false claim that, in the article's words, "global temperatures have declined for 11 years." McCullagh identified that claim as one of "a number of recent developments [one of the document's authors, EPA researcher Alan Carlin] said the EPA did not consider" before it submitted a key finding that could lead to EPA regulation of carbon dioxide. In fact, the claim that "global temperatures have declined for 11 years" is simply not true. Annual global average temperatures have both risen and fallen over the past 11 years, and while there have been some relatively cooler years during that period -- including a decline in each of the past three relative to the year before -- climate scientists reject the idea that those temperatures are any indication that global warming is slowing or does not exist. Scientists have identified a long-term warming trend spanning several decades that is independent from the normal climate variability -- which includes relatively short-term changes in climate due to events like El Niño and La Niña -- to which they attribute the recent relatively cooler temperatures.
In a February 11 Guardian op-ed, Vicky Pope, the head of climate change advice at the U.K. Met Office Hadley Centre, wrote that claims about the pace of global warming based only on developments in the past 10 years or in the 1990s are not valid, "since natural variations always occur on this timescale." She continued, "1998 was a record-breaking warm year as long-term man-made warming combined with a naturally occurring strong El Niño. In contrast, 2008 was slightly cooler than previous years partly because of a La Niña. Despite this, it was still the 10th warmest on record." According to the Met Office, "Over the last ten years, global temperatures have warmed more slowly than the long-term trend. But this does not mean that global warming has slowed down or even stopped. It is entirely consistent with our understanding of natural fluctuations of the climate within a trend of continued long-term warming."
As this graph of annual global average temperatures from the U.K. Met Office Hadley Centre shows, the claim in the internal EPA document that, in the words of CBS, "global temperatures have declined for 11 years" is simply not true:"
"Reporting on possibly "suppressed" EPA document, CBS suppressed actual climate science
CBSNews.com uncritically reported an internal EPA document's false claim that "global temperatures have declined for 11 years."
In a June 26 CBSNews.com article reporting that the Environmental Protection Agency "may have suppressed" an internal report on climate change, senior correspondent Declan McCullagh uncritically reported the document's false claim that, in the article's words, "global temperatures have declined for 11 years." McCullagh identified that claim as one of "a number of recent developments [one of the document's authors, EPA researcher Alan Carlin] said the EPA did not consider" before it submitted a key finding that could lead to EPA regulation of carbon dioxide. In fact, the claim that "global temperatures have declined for 11 years" is simply not true. Annual global average temperatures have both risen and fallen over the past 11 years, and while there have been some relatively cooler years during that period -- including a decline in each of the past three relative to the year before -- climate scientists reject the idea that those temperatures are any indication that global warming is slowing or does not exist. Scientists have identified a long-term warming trend spanning several decades that is independent from the normal climate variability -- which includes relatively short-term changes in climate due to events like El Niño and La Niña -- to which they attribute the recent relatively cooler temperatures.
In a February 11 Guardian op-ed, Vicky Pope, the head of climate change advice at the U.K. Met Office Hadley Centre, wrote that claims about the pace of global warming based only on developments in the past 10 years or in the 1990s are not valid, "since natural variations always occur on this timescale." She continued, "1998 was a record-breaking warm year as long-term man-made warming combined with a naturally occurring strong El Niño. In contrast, 2008 was slightly cooler than previous years partly because of a La Niña. Despite this, it was still the 10th warmest on record." According to the Met Office, "Over the last ten years, global temperatures have warmed more slowly than the long-term trend. But this does not mean that global warming has slowed down or even stopped. It is entirely consistent with our understanding of natural fluctuations of the climate within a trend of continued long-term warming."
As this graph of annual global average temperatures from the U.K. Met Office Hadley Centre shows, the claim in the internal EPA document that, in the words of CBS, "global temperatures have declined for 11 years" is simply not true:"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
so will the worshippers still be worshipping when the feds break down their doors at midnight? nt
msongs
Jul 2013
#1
You will know them by their worship sign posted on the door. "No Ram-Me Likey!"
Safetykitten
Jul 2013
#5
Since many folks use the same password across systems (when they can)
The Straight Story
Jul 2013
#6
Anyone stupid enough to use the same password for two different purposes deserves to be hacked.
FarCenter
Jul 2013
#10
What kind of elitist crap is this? People who don't use unique passwords are
Ed Suspicious
Jul 2013
#12
Maybe people will read a strong statement and learn - better some are outraged than poor practices
FarCenter
Jul 2013
#15
you mean like older folks who maybe aren't really good at using computers or have memory
liberal_at_heart
Jul 2013
#14
No intelligence agency is nearly as omniscient as people seem to think they are.
Posteritatis
Jul 2013
#21
There's nothing serious about that computing power alongside modern encryption.
Posteritatis
Jul 2013
#65
Nothing to see here. If you are not doing anything wrong, what's the problem. Besides 'our people'
Purveyor
Jul 2013
#3
I have more security on my world of warcraft account than I have at any of my banking institutions,
Ed Suspicious
Jul 2013
#11
they can demand all they want but those companies have lawyers who know
arely staircase
Jul 2013
#20
Last I read warrants were coming 200 sheets/roll for two-ply, 48 rolls in the Family size. n/t
jtuck004
Jul 2013
#25
Given that the court that issues them is secret, and the entity they are served on is bound by that
jtuck004
Jul 2013
#29
Article doesn't really give a Date or that this is a New Sweeping Request, though.
KoKo
Jul 2013
#22
This is an interesting and fascinating artcile, well worth reading beyond the headline.
arcane1
Jul 2013
#27
He has a history of making stuff up. In mid-June, he misrepresented remarks of Congressman Nadler:
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#60
All I can say is wow. With that they could lure whistle blowers to remote sites and kidnap them.
pam4water
Jul 2013
#33
Well the state of Oregon just made it illegal for businesses (OR universities)...
cascadiance
Jul 2013
#64
"If it's true that Al Gore created the Internet, then I created the 'Al Gore created the Internet'
DevonRex
Jul 2013
#72
The author is a global warming denier, libertarian economist, Carnegie Melon grad.
DevonRex
Jul 2013
#73