General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why Trayvon may have been heading north on the dog path and still not "doubling back" to ambush GZ [View all]louis-t
(24,490 posts)Prosecution didn't present evidence about their finances. It's irrelevant, but it shows a pattern of dishonesty. Here is the link anyway.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57452183/shellie-zimmerman-george-zimmermans-wife-allegedly-used-small-transfers-to-hide-finances/
You are once again misquoting me. I never said he said "that isn't me". Read my post again, I said exactly what you said. "It didn't sound like me". Jeez, who's the one making stuff up?
What's this about being a doctor and "handle his gun"? Jeez, you argue like a teabagger.
Uh, a small amount of THC was found in his system. Do you pay attention to ANY evidence?
I never said Zimmerman was convicted of anything. He did strike an undercover police officer, was charged with a felony, then plead down to misdemeanor and had it thrown out after entering alcohol rehab. He also had a restraining order put on him for domestic violence. Just what I said. Documented history of aggression.
I have NO idea what you are talking about re: DNA.
The testimony today did NOT determine that one was on top of the other. All they could determine was that the clothing was a few inches from the skin when he was shot. If the defense were to ask this expert who was on top, it would have been objected to as speculation. There is no way that ballistic guy could say for sure the kid was sitting on top of the killer. The defense only has to prove he wasn't lying on his back when shot.
I am going by what I understand Florida law to be re: 2nd degree murder. You, on the other hand, have just admitted that your mind was made up before you saw any evidence. Where's YOUR law degree? Sick of arguing with you.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):