Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OilemFirchen

(7,287 posts)
14. And another example of the depths to which modern "journalism" has plunged.
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 04:54 PM
Jul 2013

BTW, I'm happy to start the character assassination. Some people simply deserve it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Walt#cite_note-2

Jonathan Chait of The New Republic has called Walt an "ultra-Nixonian realist.


... which refers to this, from Chait:

You do see a fainter echo of this (Nixonian anti-Jewish) view today on the fringes of the debate among the likes of ultra-Nixonian realists like Stephen Walt, but even Walt believes that Americans Jews can prove their loyalty by adopting a sufficiently left-wing line on Israel. It's hard to imagine any president today refusing to allow his own national security adviser to participate in Israel-related debates on account of being Jewish.


More from Wikipedia:

Walt argues that NATO must be sustained because of four major areas where close cooperation is beneficial to European and American interest.[3]

Defeating international terrorism; Walt sees a need for cooperation between Europe and the United States in managing terrorist networks and stopping the flow of money to terror cells.[3]

Limiting the spread of weapons of mass destruction; Walt argues that anti-proliferation efforts are most successful when Europe and the U.S. work in concert to bring loose nuclear material into responsible custody. He cites the case of Libya's willingness to abandon its nascent fission program after being pressured mulitilaterally as evidence of this.[3]

Managing the world economy; lowering barriers to trade and investment particularly between the U.S. and the E.U. will accelerates economic growth. Notable differences in trade policy stem mainly in areas of agricultural policy.[3]

Dealing with failed states; failed states are breeding grounds for anti-western movements. Managing failed states such as Afghanistan, Bosnia and Somalia require a multinational response since the U.S. has insufficient wealth to modernise and rebuild these alone. In this area European allies are especially desirable because they have more experience with peacekeeping and "nation-building".[3]


Hitch yer wagons to him if you wish. I'll keep my distance from the disingenuous fuck, thank you.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Snowden Deserves An Immed...»Reply #14