Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

marmar

(78,882 posts)
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 11:00 PM Mar 2013

Robert Parry: ‘Dirty War’ Questions for Pope Francis [View all]


from Consortium News:


‘Dirty War’ Questions for Pope Francis
March 13, 2013

Exclusive: The U.S. “news” networks bubbled with excitement over the selection of Argentine Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio to be Pope Francis I. But there was silence on the obvious question that should be asked about any senior cleric from Argentina: What was Bergoglio doing during the “dirty war,” writes Robert Parry.

By Robert Parry


If one wonders if the U.S. press corps has learned anything in the decade since the Iraq War – i.e. the need to ask tough question and show honest skepticism – it would appear from the early coverage of the election of Pope Francis I that U.S. journalists haven’t changed at all, even at “liberal” outlets like MSNBC.

The first question that a real reporter should ask about an Argentine cleric who lived through the years of grotesque repression, known as the “dirty war,” is what did this person do, did he stand up to the murderers and torturers or did he go with the flow. If the likes of Chris Matthews and other commentators on MSNBC had done a simple Google search, they would have found out enough about Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio to slow their bubbling enthusiasm.

Bergoglio, now the new Pope Francis I, has been identified publicly as an ally of Argentine’s repressive leaders during the “dirty war” when some 30,000 people were “disappeared” or killed, many stripped naked, chained together, flown out over the River Plate or the Atlantic Ocean and pushed sausage-like out of planes to drown.

The “disappeared” included women who were pregnant at the time of their arrest. In some bizarre nod to Catholic theology, they were kept alive only long enough to give birth before they were murdered and their babies were farmed out to military families, including to people directly involved in the murder of the babies’ mothers. .................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://consortiumnews.com/2013/03/13/dirty-war-questions-for-pope-francis/



30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ok. Lets take this to the edge RobertEarl Mar 2013 #1
I knew it, I knew it, I knew it...the nazi angle would come into play sooner or later! Purveyor Mar 2013 #2
No Nazis in Argentina? RobertEarl Mar 2013 #3
As I suggested...only a matter of time and 'you people' didn't disappoint. Carry on. eom Purveyor Mar 2013 #8
Thanks for showing your true colors. Zoeisright Mar 2013 #12
Michael moore amuse bouche Mar 2013 #13
This is just too easy.... OldDem2012 Mar 2013 #4
And the new Pope is involved in this, of course? eom Purveyor Mar 2013 #9
Don't act ignorant. It's unbecoming of a DU poster. nt. OldDem2012 Mar 2013 #11
I see ignorant statements every day No Vested Interest Mar 2013 #16
Let me see - both parents are Italian and they arrived in Argentina in 1930 malaise Mar 2013 #29
How about some arithmetic? WWII ended in 1945, so any adult WWII Nazi was born in 1927 or earlier. struggle4progress Mar 2013 #10
Political clout is usually directly influenced by personal wealth and not so much by age.... OldDem2012 Mar 2013 #30
Facts matter. Parry quotes O'Shaughnessy in the Guardian attributing the following claim struggle4progress Mar 2013 #5
You realize he never mentioned that Bergoglio was the Archbishop, right? Gravitycollapse Mar 2013 #6
He says "with the connivance of Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio, now the Jesuit archbishop of Buenos Aires" struggle4progress Mar 2013 #7
When her wrote that Bergoglio was already the Cardinal. Gravitycollapse Mar 2013 #14
I found an article by Verbitsky, making the claim: struggle4progress Mar 2013 #17
Bergoglio is of Italian descent. He became a priest in 1969. JDPriestly Mar 2013 #15
I found an article by Verbitsky, making the claim: struggle4progress Mar 2013 #18
Thanks. JDPriestly Mar 2013 #23
The 2005 case was reportedly filed eight years ago: that should have been enough time struggle4progress Mar 2013 #19
Yes. It may have been unfounded. People can file any kind of a case. JDPriestly Mar 2013 #22
i think (though it's not completely clear) they use bergoglio's title as 'cardinal' because he was HiPointDem Mar 2013 #20
See my #17 struggle4progress Mar 2013 #21
i already saw it & have no idea why you think that's decisive. I don't know what the truth of HiPointDem Mar 2013 #24
OK. Here it is, once more, slowly and in small bits: struggle4progress Mar 2013 #25
I can't even parse that passage in Parry's article, but the claims in that article don't seem to HiPointDem Mar 2013 #26
O'Shaughnessy's garbled syntax there strongly suggests that he grabbed some Spanish text, struggle4progress Mar 2013 #27
Here's a synopsis of the book from a bookseller: struggle4progress Mar 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Robert Parry: ‘Dirty War’...