Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Robert Parry: ‘Dirty War’ Questions for Pope Francis [View all]
from Consortium News:
Dirty War Questions for Pope Francis
March 13, 2013
Exclusive: The U.S. news networks bubbled with excitement over the selection of Argentine Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio to be Pope Francis I. But there was silence on the obvious question that should be asked about any senior cleric from Argentina: What was Bergoglio doing during the dirty war, writes Robert Parry.
By Robert Parry
If one wonders if the U.S. press corps has learned anything in the decade since the Iraq War i.e. the need to ask tough question and show honest skepticism it would appear from the early coverage of the election of Pope Francis I that U.S. journalists havent changed at all, even at liberal outlets like MSNBC.
The first question that a real reporter should ask about an Argentine cleric who lived through the years of grotesque repression, known as the dirty war, is what did this person do, did he stand up to the murderers and torturers or did he go with the flow. If the likes of Chris Matthews and other commentators on MSNBC had done a simple Google search, they would have found out enough about Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio to slow their bubbling enthusiasm.
Bergoglio, now the new Pope Francis I, has been identified publicly as an ally of Argentines repressive leaders during the dirty war when some 30,000 people were disappeared or killed, many stripped naked, chained together, flown out over the River Plate or the Atlantic Ocean and pushed sausage-like out of planes to drown.
The disappeared included women who were pregnant at the time of their arrest. In some bizarre nod to Catholic theology, they were kept alive only long enough to give birth before they were murdered and their babies were farmed out to military families, including to people directly involved in the murder of the babies mothers. .................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://consortiumnews.com/2013/03/13/dirty-war-questions-for-pope-francis/
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

I knew it, I knew it, I knew it...the nazi angle would come into play sooner or later!
Purveyor
Mar 2013
#2
As I suggested...only a matter of time and 'you people' didn't disappoint. Carry on. eom
Purveyor
Mar 2013
#8
How about some arithmetic? WWII ended in 1945, so any adult WWII Nazi was born in 1927 or earlier.
struggle4progress
Mar 2013
#10
Political clout is usually directly influenced by personal wealth and not so much by age....
OldDem2012
Mar 2013
#30
Facts matter. Parry quotes O'Shaughnessy in the Guardian attributing the following claim
struggle4progress
Mar 2013
#5
You realize he never mentioned that Bergoglio was the Archbishop, right?
Gravitycollapse
Mar 2013
#6
He says "with the connivance of Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio, now the Jesuit archbishop of Buenos Aires"
struggle4progress
Mar 2013
#7
The 2005 case was reportedly filed eight years ago: that should have been enough time
struggle4progress
Mar 2013
#19
i think (though it's not completely clear) they use bergoglio's title as 'cardinal' because he was
HiPointDem
Mar 2013
#20
i already saw it & have no idea why you think that's decisive. I don't know what the truth of
HiPointDem
Mar 2013
#24
I can't even parse that passage in Parry's article, but the claims in that article don't seem to
HiPointDem
Mar 2013
#26
O'Shaughnessy's garbled syntax there strongly suggests that he grabbed some Spanish text,
struggle4progress
Mar 2013
#27