Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

usonian

(27,306 posts)
1. Hot stuff.
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 07:45 PM
Jun 25

From The Hill.

On Thursday, a federal judge based in Washington, D.C., ordered the Justice Department to unredact additional pages of the Epstein files in a suit brought by attorney and independent journalist Katie Phang.

The preliminary injunction orders redactions be removed in key documents of interest in the files, including “at least eight email exchanges with Mr. Epstein regarding a ‘torture video’ and sexual activity with young women, including minors” as well as interviews with a woman who said she was abused by President Trump as a minor.

“The Attorney General’s arguments are unpersuasive. First, Ms. Phang has identified ‘some concrete consequences of not receiving the information.’ She has identified ‘half a dozen stories she is currently unable to report’ because the Attorney General has not disclosed the information,” U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan wrote in a decision that also found Phang had a right to bring the case under the Administrative Procedures Act.

He also rebuffed the idea that Phang could have simply requested the documents through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), noting that the department itself had previously said the Epstein Files Transparency Act “directed a much broader and less redacted release of the files than would have been made under the FOIA. Certain exemptions which may have been made under FOIA were not made” in the Epstein Act release.
Hot stuff. usonian Jun 25 #1
Great ruling. Though B.See Jun 25 #2
"torture video" Dave Bowman Jun 25 #3
Yes. Codifer Jun 25 #5
With These People? GB_RN Jun 25 #9
Yes, I was thinking the same thing PatSeg Jun 26 #21
Unfortunately your logic is not flawed. FalloutShelter Jun 26 #16
So often such people think they know what they want, PatSeg Jun 26 #22
Exactly right. FalloutShelter Jun 26 #27
Way to go, Katie!!! Yay! BComplex Jun 25 #4
It was signed into law last year. warmfeet Jun 25 #6
"We tolerate everything it appears." OldBaldy1701E Jun 26 #15
I am surprised the complete files still exist misanthrope Jun 26 #24
The courts are proving to be a check and balance - often...but not often enough. yellow dahlia Jun 25 #7
Fantastic! BeneteauBum Jun 25 #8
I suspect at least, one Shit-Bag may have a little hard time to fall asleep tonight.. chouchou Jun 25 #10
Thank you Katie Phang and Judge Emmett Sullivan FakeNoose Jun 25 #11
Let's go! Akakoji Jun 25 #12
just saw this on bsky -- here's the doc link/pdf orleans Jun 25 #13
Phang is great SocialDemocrat61 Jun 26 #14
"They" will never release all of the Epstein Files. Botany Jun 26 #17
Axis Of Evil! czarjak Jun 26 #18
Looks good on paper. It will never materialize in this decade. QueerDuck Jun 26 #19
Fabulous malaise Jun 26 #20
Awesome! Will they comply ??? eom Exp Jun 26 #23
DOJ will ignore the ruling Quanto Magnus Jun 26 #25
Katie full expects them to appeal hookaleft Jun 26 #26
About to get real, people. Joinfortmill Thursday #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking: Katie Phang jus...»Reply #1