General Discussion

dweller

(28,703 posts)

9. No need for a settlement

Reply to LetMyPeopleVote (Original post)

Tue May 19, 2026, 10:18 AM

Tuesday

I went looking for the court ruling that established the funding - found this instead

The $1.8 billion ($1.776 billion) "Anti-Weaponization Fund" was established via an out-of-court settlement agreement between President Donald Trump and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), rather than by a traditional judicial ruling. The nine-page settlement document was signed by acting Attorney General Todd Blanche

😑

✌🏻

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

BeerBarrelPolka

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge is taking the position that the lawsuit does not include any settlement [View all] LetMyPeopleVote Monday OP

DOJ rzemanfl Monday #1

Who, pray tell, has standing rzemanfl Monday #2

Why is this not getting more coverage ? dweller Monday #3

Per MS NOW, congress can block it and/or taxpayers can perhaps block it. vapor2 Tuesday #7

Block what ? dweller Tuesday #8

Interesting. Ms. Toad Monday #4

Thank you dweller Monday #5

Surely they will just fabricate a settlement and refile.... unblock Monday #6

Once the judgment order is issues, the court loses.jurisdiction. n/t Ms. Toad Tuesday #14

They can't file a new lawsuit that's otherwise very similar ? unblock Tuesday #15

Not an easy question. Ms. Toad Tuesday #16

No need for a settlement dweller Tuesday #9

Rec malaise Tuesday #10

2027 congressional fraud investigation Johonny Tuesday #11

Wondering what the Roberts court will rule. Emile Tuesday #12

... cough ... dweller Tuesday #13