Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: About Trump sitting in the Supreme Court hearing [View all]ShazzieB
(22,682 posts)68. I agree with this analysis.
The idea that he can intimidate the justices is just silly, imo. Sure, he would like to bs able to dothat, and he might THINK he can, but they all know they have lifetime appointments and there's nothing he can really do to them. This part, however, makes a lot of sense to me:
The other theory is that Trump recognizes the fact that the Supreme Court wont let him rewrite constitutional law through an executive order, so he went to oral arguments as a political tactic intended to deliver an anti-immigrant message which the White House sees as more politically salient than other issues that are dominating the public conversation, such as the war with Iran and high gas prices.
The big thing for Trump is to be seen putting up a fight, Politico noted. This policy always a Hail Mary from a legal perspective is as much about signaling to the presidents base as it is a serious attempt to change the law.
The big thing for Trump is to be seen putting up a fight, Politico noted. This policy always a Hail Mary from a legal perspective is as much about signaling to the presidents base as it is a serious attempt to change the law.
I agree that Schlump is not going to get the decision he wants from the Supremes. Whether this helps him with his base is another matter. But either way, a president cannot strike down a constitutional amendment with an executive order. The can of worms that would open is one I doubt even the Gruesome Twosome (Thomas and Alito) would want to open.
I wouldn't be surprised if the ruling is 9-0 against him.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yup, based on his history, courtrooms seem to make all kinds of things escape from his ass.
Marie Marie
Apr 1
#61
True, but rump don't scare me...he's just a demented loudmouthed fool...he can't fire the Supremes (or Gladys Knight)...
wcmagumba
Apr 1
#2
I wouldn't doubt for a second that he has information on the conservative Supremes.
Baitball Blogger
Apr 1
#14
When Trump dissed Jeb Bush's wife, if Bush had spun around, went over and got all up in Trump's grill, and
flashman13
Apr 1
#47
He'll probably crap himself during the proceedings like he did at his own trial...
johnnyplankton
Apr 1
#8
Depends (pun not intended) on if the stink from a random fart or loaded diaper reaches the bench.
3Hotdogs
Apr 1
#17
Unfortunately, camera not allowed in the court. But imagine a 6:00 news video of him falling asleep
3Hotdogs
Apr 1
#18
He wants to see what he paid for - the judges "earning" their positions due to his "largess".
Wonder Why
Apr 1
#32
I doubt they will remove him, but they won't hold the hearing for him. I think he is intentionally cutting it close by
33taw
Apr 1
#40
MaddowBlog-Trump's attendance at the Supreme Court's birthright citizenship arguments won't help his case
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 1
#54
He's been doing it his whole life. On display with HRC debates. He's a fucking criminal mob boss. Period.
Evolve Dammit
Apr 1
#71