Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It is not an act of loyalty to quash conversations about our own party's role in getting to where we are today. [View all]yellow dahlia
(5,331 posts)87. Agreed!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
218 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is not an act of loyalty to quash conversations about our own party's role in getting to where we are today. [View all]
Scrivener7
17 hrs ago
OP
Sorry, it's not the Democratic Party. It's Republican voters, third party voters, and petulant nonvoters
lapucelle
17 hrs ago
#3
And maga-pub IS NOT a political party---- it is a criminal domestic terrorist organization
Jack Valentino
3 hrs ago
#207
What does any of this mean...Demanding concessions?...Taking up arms against each other?
PeaceWave
10 hrs ago
#166
I think we here all work hard to elect Democrats. And we have been doing so for years. And yet, here we are.
Scrivener7
15 hrs ago
#48
Work harder to shut down opposition narratives, most especially those from purists and punishers
lapucelle
15 hrs ago
#52
Which, by definition, has nothing to do with shutting down discussions on DU.
Scrivener7
15 hrs ago
#53
To begin with, expressing an opinion on a topic is not "shutting down discussion" on a topic.
lapucelle
14 hrs ago
#66
Even given the definitional problems (and notwithstanding the random use of latin),
lapucelle
13 hrs ago
#127
Recognizing a Latin word and saying your conclusion doesn't follow from your premises is not an argument either
Ilikepurple
5 hrs ago
#198
I agree with you 100% Scrivener7. It is not a fluke that we are in this mess.
flashman13
14 hrs ago
#71
I'm really looking forward to the primaries too. We have an incredible bench, and
Scrivener7
14 hrs ago
#73
You are? Divergent views within our own party might lead to hurt feelings afterwards.
PeaceWave
3 hrs ago
#208
It's the Democratic Party which nominates candidates which voters either accept or reject
Jose Garcia
11 hrs ago
#154
With the (somewhat) arguable exception of 2024, voters choose the candidates.
lapucelle
10 hrs ago
#165
Same here. And I'm highly suspect of the motives of anyone demanding we do otherwise.
FoxNewsSucks
14 hrs ago
#67
Yep. And that's the problem. This has nothing to do with criticizing Democrats. It has to do with looking at
Scrivener7
17 hrs ago
#8
I'm with you right up until the part about nominating a republican. But I get your point.
Scrivener7
16 hrs ago
#22
While I'm grateful to Conservatives who have drawn a line and chosen to
MadameButterfly
15 hrs ago
#62
If we don't look at the issues of the Dem structure, and question it, then we are in a cult...
yellow dahlia
14 hrs ago
#81
"I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever
Ping Tung
16 hrs ago
#11
"I am a Christian and a Democrat. That's all": FDR, when asked to define his political philosophy.
lapucelle
16 hrs ago
#21
That was his choice. That's what democracy is supposed to be about...choice.
Ping Tung
16 hrs ago
#26
Yes, folks choose to vote for Republicans or third-party candidates or to withhold any vote as punishment
lapucelle
13 hrs ago
#120
Just as there's nothing wrong calling out the politicians who support or vote for
Ping Tung
12 hrs ago
#143
I'm not talking about ripping on Dems and I'm not talking about anything that violates the TOS.
Scrivener7
16 hrs ago
#13
Fire the strategists and consultant class, The party needs to stop making the same mistakes.
yellow dahlia
14 hrs ago
#86
Any time we stop speaking truth, we benefit those who want to hide the truth.
hamsterjill
16 hrs ago
#14
But at this point, none of us is. I'm that comfortable boomer you describe.
Scrivener7
16 hrs ago
#16
Cheerleaders, the party is always right, swarm, posse, toe the line, echo chamber, blind loyalty, marching in lockstep,
betsuni
16 hrs ago
#17
Finding out facts instead of leaping to negative conclusions about Democrats is mocked as mindless loyalty. Projection.
betsuni
10 hrs ago
#164
We failed to read history, but it's only now that history is understood at all
bucolic_frolic
16 hrs ago
#18
So much yes to this! All those bad movies about evil conglomerates trying to rule the world?
Scrivener7
16 hrs ago
#29
My daughter quipped the other day - "Who knew the original Superman movie was a road map..."
harumph
15 hrs ago
#42
Trump 2.0 could have been prevented by closing the border and having a normal primary
dalton99a
16 hrs ago
#31
In his diplomatic, inoffensive way, I think President Obama pointed the way
Martin Eden
16 hrs ago
#35
I think that's a perfect example because it's my opinion that, if Democratic leaders had not gotten so much
Scrivener7
15 hrs ago
#44
So a groundswell of constituent opinion has no effect on your elected officials?
Scrivener7
12 hrs ago
#134
Social media posts and constituent opinion are two very different things. N/T
lapucelle
10 hrs ago
#167
i completely agree with you. We should be able to speak freely if it is for constructive reason
samsingh
15 hrs ago
#51
So the lesson, which I hope we have learned, is that we release it all as soon as we are able.
Scrivener7
13 hrs ago
#122
100% Agree, Scrivener 7. If we can't see our own part in something we can't improve...
johnnyplankton
15 hrs ago
#55
Everything changes except one thing that was never addressed, and still isn't.
usonian
15 hrs ago
#56
I do think the DNC is starting to realize that much of the grass roots is really pissed at the party leadership
Bluetus
14 hrs ago
#83
I think recent events have provided us with a pretty extensive list of things we
Scrivener7
14 hrs ago
#85
There was one in particular this morning that was a good example. I can't link to it. For reasons I will not state.
Scrivener7
14 hrs ago
#107
Milquetoast, strongly worded letters, old guard, status quo, gerontocracy, Vichy Dems, Surrender Dems,
betsuni
13 hrs ago
#124
Good post Scrivener7, and a worthwhile question to ask. I feel the biggest mistake we may have made is to underestimate
c-rational
14 hrs ago
#101
What a great topic. Absent discussions like these, we Dems are merely REACTING to what the other side does.
PeaceWave
14 hrs ago
#106
It's not possible currently to discuss mistakes and we are doomed to repeat them again.
Melon
11 hrs ago
#152
This and your gatekeeping is the issue that prevents open discussion and improvement.
Melon
8 hrs ago
#177
It has nothing to do with being loyal. It's about fighting back against (often) unfair and unwarranted criticism.
W_HAMILTON
11 hrs ago
#153
I may be late to this discussion, but I read it early this morning and just now thought I would add my 2cents.
Ninga
11 hrs ago
#155
And they feel just as strongly as you do about their name calling being calling it as they see it
EdmondDantes_
3 hrs ago
#205
The key: 100% confidence one is 100% correct, obviously morally righteously correct.
betsuni
1 hr ago
#212
The number of RECs, replies, and views to this OP shows just how important to the DU community...
Ol Janx Spirit
6 hrs ago
#197
I think we all have perspectives and ideas that have value, even if only to further a productive dialectic
Ilikepurple
4 hrs ago
#201