Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hope22

(4,587 posts)
31. My R sister married and divorced three times.....she moved back to her state of birth
Mon Feb 16, 2026, 03:37 PM
7 hrs ago

after becoming disabled with a terminal disease. 2009 so even then you needed a photo ID to vote and travel by plane. I gathered up her divorce papers, birth certificate and every document posted on the SOS Website and headed out to the DMV. She was wheelchair bound so getting around in a car was a big job. After waiting 45 minutes at the DMV we were called to the counter. Her social security number was entered into the system and lo and behold that number was associated with another name. Yes, her maiden name from the driver license issued when she was 17. Of course I only had access to her most recent divorce papers, current drivers license and passport. Ten states away, two additional marriage certificates and two sets of divorce papers was not going to be an easy get! Even though she was backed into a corner my other sister who was with us leaned over and whispered to her that she may have to marry our cousin Billy to get her name back. Of course we burst out laughing.(when we told Billy about this later he was all in and thought it was at least a solution that would get sister an ID to vote) I was busy scooping up papers trying to leave nothing behind when a man who had been waiting and watching the shenanigans of the clerk for what seemed like forever came up to us and said, ‘I don’t know what the problem you ladies are having is but I have to say that you have the best senses of humor I have ever seen. We thanked him as it took some of the sting out of the whole debacle. We left and headed home.

You may ask how I got the whole thing worked out and why would I care knowing my sister was going to cancel out my vote. Everyone deserves their right to vote. And what I did involved using privilege to solve the problem and I’m not proud of it. Technically we had every document necessary as the website list did not state all divorce proceedings back to the point of maiden name were necessary. The next DMV I went to was headed by someone who knew me. She could see that technically I did have the papers that were asked for. She could see that my sister was in a world of hurt and processed the State ID for us. So many women will lose their their right to vote and travel about if they implement the birth certificate name matching the ID 30, 40,50 years down the road. It is complete insanity. For the most part this will affect females. I guess it’s time to stop changing names for whatever reason.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

🤔 Gee, they didn't seem to think this one out underpants 12 hrs ago #1
They don't think anything through. ChicagoTeamster 10 hrs ago #16
RepubliSCUM don't believe that the law of unintended consequences applies to THEM. MLWR 9 hrs ago #23
Definitely not, especially since polling research has been showing that married women Jack Valentino 4 hrs ago #35
I am looking forward to having all the MAGAt women around me losing their votes UpInArms 12 hrs ago #2
trad wives change their name more often RainCaster 12 hrs ago #3
I was going to say the same thing AZJonnie 11 hrs ago #12
We used my wife's (better) surname for our kids. thought crime 11 hrs ago #14
They also have marriage certificates. Why would they be unable to vote? pcdb 8 hrs ago #30
Because marriage certificates are not a valid form of ID in the SAVE Act /nt Sweet Freedom 5 hrs ago #34
Right, but one would use the marriage certificate to get a valid form of ID to vote. pcdb 42 min ago #39
SHOCKER! FalloutShelter 12 hrs ago #4
In normal times, it would be a slam-dunk loser in the courts Wednesdays 10 hrs ago #22
I hope this is true and the SAVE ACT dies a miserable death peggysue2 12 hrs ago #5
Easy to get papers. Know Rick! usonian 12 hrs ago #6
Progressive women (and probably others as well) - TBF 12 hrs ago #7
That might be the easiest way to proceed. NH Ethylene 11 hrs ago #9
I have everything in my lock box - TBF 11 hrs ago #10
I actually looked into changing mine back maptap22 9 hrs ago #27
I went to my local county court and filled out a form. NH Ethylene 8 hrs ago #29
I hear you - but I did all mine myself TBF 3 hrs ago #38
I am still curious to know what JD Vance's birth certificate name is Walleye 12 hrs ago #8
Also more Democrats than Republican women are likely to keep their maiden name in marriage SSJVegeta 11 hrs ago #11
Republicans also seem to think that only Republican women get married. Quiet Em 11 hrs ago #13
Valid Point F-18_AMO 10 hrs ago #15
Back then, people would look at you strange if you said Zackzzzz 10 hrs ago #17
Republican women might be more inclined to take their hubby's names, too. nt Exp 10 hrs ago #18
Its possible the MAGATS are worried about this aspect of the Save Act, sdfernando 10 hrs ago #19
As Home Simpson would say..... ProudMNDemocrat 10 hrs ago #20
They really just want the optics of them pushing it and it failing jgmiller 10 hrs ago #21
I thought that too. durablend 9 hrs ago #24
I also think more Democratic women didn't change their last name when they married Buckeyeblue 9 hrs ago #25
I live in red hell Traildogbob 9 hrs ago #26
Said this last week Boo1 8 hrs ago #28
My R sister married and divorced three times.....she moved back to her state of birth Hope22 7 hrs ago #31
Also, liberal women are more likely to retain their name Miguelito Loveless 7 hrs ago #32
this is bad for everyone. themaguffin 6 hrs ago #33
Not only that mercuryblues 4 hrs ago #36
I'd also point out that right wing women Bettie 4 hrs ago #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So I heard a good respons...»Reply #31