General Discussion

leftstreet

(39,663 posts)

36. Make them fill out job applications

Reply to 4bonhoffer (Original post)

Mon Feb 16, 2026, 10:38 AM

8 hrs ago

Like the rest of us

Set qualifications OTHER than birth status and age before they can even qualify to run

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

85 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Please, stop with the TERM LIMITS bs. [View all] 4bonhoffer 10 hrs ago OP

You are so right. Americanme 10 hrs ago #1

That's a good point Conjuay 10 hrs ago #2

Same! EuterpeThelo 10 hrs ago #9

re: "Agreed we should primary those who aren't effective" thesquanderer 7 hrs ago #54

I agree with you. Its ridiculous. Callie1979 2 hrs ago #75

100% Right on! NT CommonHumanity 10 hrs ago #3

I think that the longer someone stays in politics, the more likely they have convictions. everyonematters 10 hrs ago #4

Yes, or to feather their nest, lately that's the goal Walleye 10 hrs ago #6

I agree 100%, besides it's unconstitutional, not that that matters anymore Walleye 10 hrs ago #5

How is it unconstitutional? iemanja 8 min ago #85

Term limits who have deprived us . . Michiblue 10 hrs ago #7

There are just as many good reasons for term limits as there are bad ones. sop 10 hrs ago #8

+1 leftstreet 8 hrs ago #35

We need campaign finance reform MadameButterfly 8 hrs ago #37

Because they are two sides of the same bright, shiny coin. Maru Kitteh 6 hrs ago #65

i also object to the party putting thumbs on the scale to promote the leadership's MadameButterfly 4 hrs ago #67

I agree with that. I guess I was primarily speaking to the poster's Maru Kitteh 14 min ago #83

This message was self-deleted by its author Maru Kitteh 1 hr ago #76

Bingo. See reply at #39 harumph 7 hrs ago #46

How about putting the other changes in place MadameButterfly 4 hrs ago #68

They WHERE CALLED ELECTIONS now they are called how do we screw the voters and keep them from voting. usaf-vet 9 hrs ago #10

which, of course - doesn't address the subject (or point made) in the OP in the slightest ... - - -(nt)- stopdiggin 8 hrs ago #43

I agree PatSeg 9 hrs ago #11

we need real term limits..two terms and out... agingdem 9 hrs ago #12

I've been preaching this for years. Not to mention the revolving door to lobbying would accelerate... themaguffin 9 hrs ago #13

Term limits are aniicemocratic. If they've been there too long vote em out. tirebiter 9 hrs ago #14

There are so many things that need to be reformed before we can even consider term limits ibegurpard 9 hrs ago #15

Preach! ybbor 9 hrs ago #16

The problem is gerrymandering, not term limits. Emile 9 hrs ago #17

I've been arguing against term limits for years. Martin Eden 9 hrs ago #18

Very difficult to overcome incumbent name recognition MichMan 48 min ago #81

Totally agree DownriverDem 9 hrs ago #19

I'll take it a step further Polybius 9 hrs ago #20

let's hold off until trump is out. We don't need to give him even more incentive to fuck things up. themaguffin 9 hrs ago #22

He's more unpopular than ever now though Polybius 9 hrs ago #23

Obama isn't going to run. Getting past this shit show is priority 1 themaguffin 7 hrs ago #61

at this point - cab67 3 hrs ago #70

100% agree. The best argument against term limits is this question: Pototan 9 hrs ago #21

I like that analogy. tinrobot 8 hrs ago #29

Yes! radical noodle 9 hrs ago #24

If elections define one's term . . . otchmoson 9 hrs ago #25

it just empowers staffers. mopinko 8 hrs ago #26

Yes, because it's important to have octogenerians driving our culture relayerbob 8 hrs ago #27

Thank you. We need to fix election financing, gerrymandering, and the electoral college. tinrobot 8 hrs ago #28

I would make one exception - cab67 8 hrs ago #30

there is no way to remove Supreme Court justices ibegurpard 8 hrs ago #32

Please stop telling people what to consider/debate Mysterian 8 hrs ago #31

How about for SCOTUS? CaptainTruth 8 hrs ago #33

The voters NEVER got a choice there stopdiggin 7 hrs ago #52

Yes, clearly. And I still think it makes sense to have term limits for SCOTUS. CaptainTruth 7 hrs ago #60

I'm in favor of 8 years for SC Justices LogDog75 3 hrs ago #71

Interesting. Thanks for sharing! CaptainTruth 1 hr ago #80

I agree with you and add this point: Mr. Mustard 2023 8 hrs ago #34

Make them fill out job applications leftstreet 8 hrs ago #36

What we need is campaign finance reform Beausoleil 8 hrs ago #38

I used to be in the no term limits camp - not anymore. harumph 8 hrs ago #39

except that 'term limits' doesn't really address any of the aggrievements you have with the system stopdiggin 7 hrs ago #49

I think we need an age limit for service Mosby 8 hrs ago #40

You are right. I was so impressed with our Dems in Congress during the Ghislaine Bondi hearings this past weekend Maraya1969 8 hrs ago #41

I believe in term limits. Layzeebeaver 8 hrs ago #42

Term limits has always been the province of the low brow, bumper sticker mentality stopdiggin 7 hrs ago #44

Term limits don't solve a single problem. Its a populist slogan that adds zero value to anything. FascismIsDeath 7 hrs ago #45

I'm a believer in term limits. However, back during the Gingrich days, the repugs talked term limits until they got Wonder Why 7 hrs ago #47

Do you favor repeal of the 22nd amendment? n/t Shrek 7 hrs ago #48

Both that and the age-baiting arguments have too many flaws Torchlight 7 hrs ago #50

We already have term limits: the voting cycle. Get the vote out. Stop accepting your vote means nothing ... marble falls 7 hrs ago #51

Florida is the poster child for the corrupting influence of term limits. hay rick 7 hrs ago #53

B I.N.G.O. markodochartaigh 7 hrs ago #57

I disagree ABC123Easy 7 hrs ago #55

In my opinion - cab67 3 hrs ago #69

You may be able to pass laws to limit partisan gerrymandering, BUT . . . markpkessinger 2 hrs ago #73

Agreed! ABC123Easy 33 min ago #82

WHY IS NOBODY SAYING the bottom line. markodochartaigh 7 hrs ago #56

Example: what if Chris Murphy of Adam Schiff were ALBliberal 7 hrs ago #58

I am with you on this. pandr32 7 hrs ago #59

Agreed, for additional reasons: Exp 7 hrs ago #62

Nationalization of politics, blaming those crooks off in Washington, Drain the Swamp. But not their own reps! betsuni 6 hrs ago #63

Completely agree! MatthewStLouis 6 hrs ago #64

Agree completely. Term limits are really just a limit on Democracy. It's telling voters they can't have their chosen tritsofme 6 hrs ago #66

I favor term limits for Executive offices and Supreme Courts LogDog75 2 hrs ago #72

Sorry I still support an Amendment for term limits. Lifetime seats have gotten ridiculous. Callie1979 2 hrs ago #74

Citizen's United is the "corporate wet dream" that term limits, well, limits Dave says 1 hr ago #77

I whole heartedly agree 👍 Figarosmom 1 hr ago #78

Agreed! People only want term limits when the don't like who's in office. JohnnyRingo 1 hr ago #79

Why is it that people think they have a right to censors others' posts and thoughts iemanja 11 min ago #84