Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ITAL

(1,291 posts)
15. It was really successive revolutions
Sun Feb 15, 2026, 07:29 PM
19 hrs ago

They kinda just say everything from 1910-1920 was just the Mexican Revolution, but there were about five different leaders who took over and many others who had fiefdoms here and there. It was really a mess down there.

I end to agree with the above post that said most of the folks with Mexican descent in Texas probably descend from that rather than the 1800s settlers. There actually weren't many Tejanos really -- what's now Texas was really unpopulated. That's the main reason Stephen F. Austin got permission for Anglo settlements in the first place.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'South Texas will never b...»Reply #15