Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 08:09 AM Dec 2012

When it comes to civil liberties, apparently Democrats are just as bad as Republicans. [View all]

"President Barack Obama has signed into law a five-year extension of the U.S. government's authority to monitor the overseas activity of suspected foreign spies and terrorists.

The warrantless intercept program would have expired at the end of 2012 without the president's approval. The renewal bill won final passage in the Senate on Friday.

Known as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the law allows the government to monitor overseas phone calls and emails without obtaining a court order for each intercept."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/30/obama-fisa-warrantless-wiretapping_n_2385690.html

I remember back when Bush started pulling this crap, and we were justifiably outraged. Now, with Obama pulling the same shit, hardly a peep, or worse, defense of the indefensible. Sad, truly sad.

31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Unfortunately, history shows a number of examples of this customerserviceguy Dec 2012 #1
I do not agree that this legislation is 'nothing'. The comparison is strained. The actual question Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #4
Spying on suspected foreign nationals overseas customerserviceguy Jan 2013 #30
I disagree, this legislation isn't "nothing", MadHound Dec 2012 #6
You have it backwards pscot Dec 2012 #11
Not only can be but was used. zeemike Dec 2012 #15
He may not control the country, but he can still speak out pscot Dec 2012 #20
Well there is a long history of what happens when you piss off the PTB zeemike Dec 2012 #21
Post removed Post removed Jan 2013 #29
I think the fantasy that we Democrats are all on the same side and fighting for the same things woo me with science Dec 2012 #2
It is not about protecting us. It's about...... Hotler Dec 2012 #8
You would think that the majority of people would somehow get a clue... Larry Ogg Dec 2012 #19
See, they Can be Perfectly Bi-Partisan when fredamae Dec 2012 #3
Cheer up! The people that will be the most upset haven't even been born yet green for victory Dec 2012 #5
Those fuckers (Both sides of the isle)..... Hotler Dec 2012 #7
No government will willingly give up power, once granted. X_Digger Dec 2012 #9
Exactly what I told my now Tea Party friends way back when Bush obtained those powers. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #13
The problem with the loss of civil liberties gollygee Dec 2012 #10
"I remember back when Bush started pulling this crap, and we were justifiably outraged" Bad_Ronald Dec 2012 #12
Exactly. Arctic Dave Dec 2012 #14
Oh no, that goes way back zeemike Dec 2012 #17
We have a bunch of politicians who have risen to power under a system of back room deals Dustlawyer Dec 2012 #16
Most of the bi-partisanship is of the FP/WOT kind stupidicus Dec 2012 #18
Does high office result in Old Troop Dec 2012 #22
Sadly so. We have two corporate statist parties, only one is insane. and we accept crumbs ... villager Dec 2012 #23
+1 forestpath Dec 2012 #24
FISA, domestic surveillance & the NSA's new $2bn datacenter Ian62 Dec 2012 #25
TrailBlazer Ian62 Dec 2012 #26
I guess Big Brother is OK as long as your party is in power davidn3600 Dec 2012 #27
Don't worry zipplewrath Dec 2012 #28
Frederick Douglass put it best, IMO. Egalitarian Thug Jan 2013 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When it comes to civil li...