Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

gfarber

(278 posts)
31. Emoluments Clause
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 02:29 PM
Dec 2025


At a Trump broadcast coast to coast,
A reporter stepped up to the bloke:
“Please tell us on air,
With receipts if you dare,
How billions were earned—no clause broke?”

With the cameras all glowing quite bright,
And the audience tuned in that night,
Came a query direct:
“Can you help us connect
Your profits with law done just right?”

The Emoluments Clause took the stage,
Not a whisper, but a front-page engage.
“Three billion, you say?
While in office—okay…
Could you walk us through that to quell the rage?”

No sidebars, no spin, no delay,
Just a question in plain USA:
“As President sworn,
How were fortunes still grown
Without crossing constitutional gray?”

The crowd held its breath, live and still,
As the mic hovered close to the grill:
“Explain, if you would,
For the public’s own good—
How the math works and follows the will.”

On a stage with a bald eagle seal,
Came a question both simple and surreal:
“Three billion, sir—how?
As President, wow.
Was the Clause on vacation in Peel?”

With confetti and cannons galore,
And a crowd yelling “Encore! Encore!”
Someone asked through a kazoo,
“Is that income from you,
Or from hotels that bill foreign decor?”

The Emoluments Clause wore a hat,
Said, “I thought we agreed I’d watch that.”
But it blinked twice, confused,
As the profits accrued,
And fell asleep on a velvet doormat.

A moderator, nervous but brave,
At a nationally televised wave,
Asked, “Explain to us all,
With a pie chart or scrawl,
How billions obeyed what you gave.”

Was it pennies? Was it gold? Was it air?
Was it branding? Was it hair?
Asked the crowd in a hush,
As accountants went shush,
And the Clause did a shrug from its chair.

A jumbotron flickered and froze,
Showing numbers in clownish repose:
“Three billion earned clean?
While running the scene?
Please show us the math, if you chose.”

Then a trombone went wah-wah on cue,
As the question just hovered and grew:
“How does one make a stack,
While the law says ‘step back’—
Is it magic? Or hotels? Or glue?”

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Law without prosecution is merely a suggestion. usonian Dec 2025 #1
"Law without prosecution is merely a suggestion mdbl Dec 2025 #7
No media have the spine to ask him that. n/t CousinIT Dec 2025 #2
Neither does ANYONE else. IMHO. Captain Zero Dec 2025 #3
I always thought they should have impeached for everything... Chemical Bill Dec 2025 #22
Sadly, the USSC kind of said emoluments are not a problem...nt Wounded Bear Dec 2025 #4
Covering their own ass on this gravy train ride. KPN Dec 2025 #11
That won't happen with this crop of "journalists". LoisB Dec 2025 #5
Well, there wouldn't be a satisfying answer PatSeg Dec 2025 #6
His answer: I don't know anything about it - my sons are running things. Look, SQUIRREL! Marie Marie Dec 2025 #8
Ha, ha, sounds about right PatSeg Dec 2025 #9
Frontotemporal dementnia MadameButterfly Dec 2025 #16
Yep, which confirms PatSeg Dec 2025 #20
But it still should be asked because.... electric_blue68 Dec 2025 #13
Yes, absolutely PatSeg Dec 2025 #14
Perfect! KPN Dec 2025 #10
He would say leftieNanner Dec 2025 #12
He'd first ask "Who are you with?" Seinan Sensei Dec 2025 #29
"Emoluments" is a Democrat hoax, a scam. JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2025 #15
I'm sorry to disagree Dan, JMCKUSICK Dec 2025 #17
You know I have thought about that in reference to the Red States Farmers Dan Dec 2025 #23
Nope. They know he is lying but they want immigrants gone and liberals punished for something or other. travelingthrulife Dec 2025 #28
He wouldn't ABC123Easy Dec 2025 #18
They all know they will be banned! nt ProudProgressiveNow Dec 2025 #19
He's dumb enough to reply "$3 billion? Terrible reporter, I made $6 billion. $3 billion is fake news. flvegan Dec 2025 #21
Trump can't even pronounce " Emoluments Clause"..... much less understand it Jack Valentino Dec 2025 #24
Reporters should surely ask the question vapor2 Dec 2025 #25
He is a pathological liar, and would flatly deny it. Martin Eden Dec 2025 #26
I think I would add... OldBaldy1701E Dec 2025 #27
Waste of time. His answer would be,"because I'm a great businessman." Martin68 Dec 2025 #30
Emoluments Clause gfarber Dec 2025 #31
Outstanding!!! Dan Dec 2025 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I would like to hear some...»Reply #31