Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rog

(907 posts)
27. I'm not sure I'm communicating effectively.
Sat Nov 22, 2025, 06:32 PM
Saturday

I tried to make it clear that I double-check everything. What technology is good for is doing the busy work of organization and getting 'ink on paper', which can then be edited. We are talking about a large volume of technical information here. For example, I'm looking at major cervical fusion surgery. NotebookLM has been really good at helping me organize highly technical information from various academic sources I have found, based on information given by my neurosurgeon, getting all the pros and cons in one place, and putting it into a format that I can study more easily. It has been very good at helping me to 'decode', for lack of a better word, extremely complex medical studies. Again, this particular LLM never strays from a sources (or multiple sources) that I supply.

In another example, I used it to great effect in a recent local election for school board. It is really difficult to get a lot of info about school board candidates, but I found interviews (in a bunch of different places) that individual candidates had done, questionnaires that they had responded to, a couple of facebook posts by a few candidates, newspaper articles here and there in local papers, some audio interviews, a few of them had web pages that offered profiles, etc, etc. I was able to link all those sources and then query that data to compare their positions and points of view regarding various topics I thought were important.

re: "... why do you want or need profiles of doctors' appointments? Although if your doctors are dumb enough to use AI to summarize appointments, it might be a good idea to have your own recording of the appointment, and to check any notes they have that you're allowed to check," I consider that tone EXTREMELY and unnecessarily confrontational, but I'll do my best to respond.

First of all, my doctors are *not* 'dumb'. I want to understand everything that is said in my appointments, and it's not a good idea to rely on one's memory. That's why hospitals recommend taking a friend or relative along, or taking really good notes, or making a recording.

Re: your condescending comment that it 'might be a good idea to have my own recording', if you actually read and understood my post, that is EXACTLY what I do. The voice recognition capability of the LLM allows me to easily make a word-for-word transcription that only requires minor edits. That gives me a hard copy of what was actually said during the appointment, which is MUCH easier to absorb than listening to an audio file. Combining the information from that recoding with the doctor's summary gives me way more detail than either one separately. Using a computer to help me do that is far more efficient than laboriously typing out every word myself, and it puts multiple appointments into a format that I can easily refer to at a later date.

I am 81 years old, and I've been using computers since they became available. I was on the internet before there were browsers, and I remember the first rudimentary, text-only websites. My first browser was LYNX, before that it was telnet, veronica, jughead, archie, etc, etc I believe in using the technology that's available to help me perform tedious tasks.

So, rather than attacking me for whatever reason, how about stating your point of view in a logical and considered manner?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Only for those who take it at face value. I immediately expect something to be wrong-- at least partially and hlthe2b Saturday #1
Yes that's the totally sensible approach ... to distrust the information until it has been corroborated FakeNoose Saturday #25
Also understand how low even that bar was. Remember the disdain for "Google University" RockRaven Saturday #2
I've seen so many people posting "I ran this by Chat GPT and this is what it came up with" or chia Saturday #3
That is so cringe-worthy to me. I can't believe how uncritically people have accepted this Iris Saturday #10
If you're going to use AI... ultralite001 Saturday #4
It's Cliff Notes in a new incarnation. Speedy and shallow. IMO. nt allegorical oracle Saturday #5
I'll bet Cliff Notes at least had 'some' human review. And the notes were revised over the years. erronis Saturday #11
Sure ... the Cliff Notes were written by live humans FakeNoose Saturday #26
;-{) Goonch Saturday #6
Whatever chatbot(s?) generated that AI-promoting AI slop answer for you makes no reference at all highplainsdem Saturday #9
Please don't tell other people what to post. Jack Valentino Sunday #40
This is a message board for people to communicate, not a display for AI slop. If it's treated as acceptable highplainsdem Sunday #41
Yeah, we all have our crosses to bear.... Jack Valentino Sunday #42
It was a request saying please, not an order. As for your availing yourself of the technology - it's unlikely highplainsdem Sunday #43
I put my use of any technology whatsoever which will help me to oppose TRUMP Jack Valentino Monday #44
Kick SheltieLover Saturday #7
Thanks! highplainsdem Saturday #21
Yw. Ty for being our resident expert on ai slop! SheltieLover Saturday #22
Doing a google search is hardly the best way to learn something to begin with... Wounded Bear Saturday #8
I have been using Google's 'NotebookLM', I think with good results. rog Saturday #12
Why aren't you writing those reports yourself, if they're supposedly from you? And why do you want highplainsdem Saturday #20
I'm not sure I'm communicating effectively. rog Saturday #27
I emphasized writing for yourself because writing is critical to thinking and shouldn't be turned over highplainsdem Saturday #33
OK. It's clear that your reading comprehension is limited, since we - apparently - agree ... rog Saturday #34
You ignored my pointing out that genAI tools are fundamentally unethical because they're trained illegally highplainsdem Saturday #35
You're just a wealth of information, aren't you? rog Sunday #36
If you had spent a bit more time simply googling, you'd have learned quickly for yourself that natural highplainsdem Sunday #37
(sigh) re: your assumptions about my diet ... vegan since about 1974 ... rog Sunday #38
Sigh. I haven't "singled you out" - I've posted hundreds of threads here on the pitfalls of using genAI, highplainsdem Sunday #39
I like going down the research holes of Wikipedia, pubmed, phys.org, Medscape, etc. erronis Saturday #13
Butlerian Jihad... BurnDoubt Saturday #14
This!!! paleotn Saturday #19
The ship has sailed. Professors are using it now Sympthsical Saturday #15
And there are more and more studies showing how harmful AI is, how much it dumbs users down. highplainsdem Saturday #23
We've said the same about social media Sympthsical Saturday #24
It's the end of humanity. We're doomed. QueerDuck Saturday #16
Dumb comparisons, and you know it. Or should. highplainsdem Saturday #18
so much wrong with AI barbtries Saturday #17
You can also create your own 'custom' search engine to do that ... rog Saturday #30
Seen on one of my fitness sites last spring: CrispyQ Saturday #28
Butlerian Jihad... BurnDoubt Saturday #29
OOPS!!! BurnDoubt Saturday #31
Seems Obvious OC375 Saturday #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Something Disturbing Happ...»Reply #27