Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cirsium

(3,945 posts)
70. Many Democrats have met with Trump
Sat Nov 22, 2025, 03:29 PM
Nov 2025

You suggest that progressives are being hypocritical because of tribe loyalty. Many Democrats have met with Trump, including Pelosi and Schumer. Wouldn't it be hypocritical to attack Mamdani and not them?

This line of attack against Mamdani (and progressives in general) is extremely weak.

I still don't see what the mayor-elect of New York City meeting with the President of the US has to do with a Democrat campaigning with an extreme right winger.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Two women vs two men. Irish_Dem Nov 2025 #1
sexism. End of story. nt mcar Nov 2025 #2
I agree LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2025 #69
But if it were Biden campaigning with Dick Cheney, I'd be against that too Polybius Nov 2025 #89
damn right RockCreek Nov 2025 #4
True words....... Nt Hope22 Nov 2025 #58
I'm glad Mamdani met with trump, same for Fetterman and other Democrats. Silent Type Nov 2025 #3
OK. Did you criticize VP Harris for campaigning with Liz Cheney? mcar Nov 2025 #5
Absolutely not, smart move despite any misplaced backlash. Silent Type Nov 2025 #6
Thanks mcar Nov 2025 #10
Well Traitor being the Polar Opposite Cha Nov 2025 #7
I was all for Harris and Cheney. I'm not sure about this meeting, but Tribetime Nov 2025 #8
To split maga even more. Good move. mobeau69 Nov 2025 #103
You'll have to find someone who condemned Harris for appearing with Cheney. maxsolomon Nov 2025 #9
Lots of people on this very site did so at the time mcar Nov 2025 #11
Let me rephrase: maxsolomon Nov 2025 #12
I'll bite. mr715 Nov 2025 #13
And what do you think of today's meeting? mcar Nov 2025 #18
I think Mamdani made a fool of Trump nt mr715 Nov 2025 #21
So it was good for Mamdani to meet with Trump mcar Nov 2025 #27
There seems to be no principles-based rationale for these attacks/praises... W_HAMILTON Nov 2025 #29
Except there was no terrible, unprincipled faction of DUers attacking Harris for campaigning with Cheney. Scrivener7 Nov 2025 #79
I didn't limit it to just DU since there certainly were those attacks on other social media. W_HAMILTON Nov 2025 #80
Lol! Scrivener7 Nov 2025 #81
Well, Mamdani is Mayor Elect mr715 Nov 2025 #33
That is some serious hair splitting mcar Nov 2025 #67
Are you from NYC? mr715 Nov 2025 #68
I'm not and I don't disagree mcar Nov 2025 #71
I appreciate your perspective. mr715 Nov 2025 #73
Thank you for your reply mcar Nov 2025 #74
Meeting with and campaigning with are two different things, you know n/t Polybius Nov 2025 #90
So? Liz Cheney Denounced Fascist Fuck Traitor Cha Nov 2025 #115
So? Polybius Nov 2025 #121
How so? Mossfern Nov 2025 #31
Did you watch? nt mr715 Nov 2025 #34
Some of it Mossfern Nov 2025 #38
Certainly: mr715 Nov 2025 #40
Reference the fable Mossfern Nov 2025 #49
I don't see how that distinguishes one from the other. mr715 Nov 2025 #52
"Standing upright without moving" reminds me of a soldier standing at attention. lapucelle Nov 2025 #96
In what way are Con Ed rates a theoretical policy win? lapucelle Nov 2025 #97
"Theoretical" mr715 Nov 2025 #102
That's not policy, theoretical or otherwise. lapucelle Nov 2025 #104
OP Is discussing a false equivalence between mr715 Nov 2025 #105
Yes, but this subthread is about something else entirely. The claim was that Trump was made a fool of. lapucelle Nov 2025 #110
My OP is a false equivalence? Do tell. mcar Nov 2025 #114
Yeah, your OP isn't a "false equivalence between the Mamdani Trump meeting, and criticism of Harris campaigning Cha Nov 2025 #116
The question of mr715 Nov 2025 #117
While you are wrong about the "false equivalence" claim, you are right about the energy analogy being "crap". lapucelle Nov 2025 #122
Got it. Thanks. mcar Nov 2025 #17
Same thing happened when Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger... sheshe2 Nov 2025 #14
I randomly pulled up two threads from the time, and DUers were very enthusiastic about both Scrivener7 Nov 2025 #65
They don't understand it was Better to have Cha Nov 2025 #118
And today? sheshe2 Nov 2025 #119
Yes Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger Cha Nov 2025 #120
Seriously? Cirsium Nov 2025 #15
... mcar Nov 2025 #19
... Cirsium Nov 2025 #23
... mr715 Nov 2025 #48
Campaigning and losing mr715 Nov 2025 #36
Well said. yardwork Nov 2025 #44
I did, in fact! mr715 Nov 2025 #47
I wish logic was taught every year in schools. yardwork Nov 2025 #57
Chess. mr715 Nov 2025 #63
That last bit. Iggo Nov 2025 #127
This doesn't seem to have had the intended effect. Scrivener7 Nov 2025 #16
What effect is that? mcar Nov 2025 #20
I assume to shame me into thinking Harris won because of Liz Cheney nt mr715 Nov 2025 #37
I also was just wondering if meeting with Trump was okay now. Nixie Nov 2025 #22
It isn't great, but it is a necessity. nt mr715 Nov 2025 #43
*Shrug* 4 pols pretending to be civil to their opposites. Ping Tung Nov 2025 #24
Post removed Post removed Nov 2025 #25
Why was Trump sitting down? bucolic_frolic Nov 2025 #26
I think both did the right thing for right reasons JI7 Nov 2025 #28
Mamdani didn't meet with Trump while campaigning leftstreet Nov 2025 #30
No one's buying that. W_HAMILTON Nov 2025 #32
It's the wrong question leftstreet Nov 2025 #39
Kamala would have been criticized regardless and Mamdani would be supported regardless... W_HAMILTON Nov 2025 #51
Okay n/t leftstreet Nov 2025 #54
I disagree with that take. See mine below. yardwork Nov 2025 #42
Hey, didn't Eric Adams meet with Trump DURING the campaign? mr715 Nov 2025 #45
No, because damn near no one liked Adams to begin with and he wasn't going to win regardless. W_HAMILTON Nov 2025 #55
Eh, sorta mr715 Nov 2025 #56
And it looks like Adams actually met with Trump not during his campaign, but while he was mayor. W_HAMILTON Nov 2025 #59
Yes, correct. mr715 Nov 2025 #60
Agreed Mossfern Nov 2025 #46
Many Democrats have met with Trump Cirsium Nov 2025 #70
I haven't attacked any of said politicians. W_HAMILTON Nov 2025 #75
Sure Cirsium Nov 2025 #77
Not the hypocrisy HERE. As you have agreed, it didn't happen here, and you have Scrivener7 Nov 2025 #82
It has happened here as well, as you yourself cited in another post. W_HAMILTON Nov 2025 #87
Again - this whole thread is a complaint against an imaginary monster. Scrivener7 Nov 2025 #91
No, it isn't. These sorts of disingenuous attacks are what brought down Hillary and Kamala. W_HAMILTON Nov 2025 #92
And what I'm saying is that you and others in this thread are imagining enemies among your fellow Democrats Scrivener7 Nov 2025 #94
Pointing out the hypocrisy and double standards about this Nixie Nov 2025 #85
No equivalence mr715 Nov 2025 #93
Wrong. Just substitute Cuomo for someone else and the Nixie Nov 2025 #95
Mamdani is the establishment. nt mr715 Nov 2025 #98
I lulz'd Nixie Nov 2025 #106
One of the perks of winning. nt mr715 Nov 2025 #107
Wrong again. It's a perk of a nonsensical switcheroo. Nixie Nov 2025 #108
Silly. H2O Man Nov 2025 #35
I'm going to annoy a lot of people by saying they're two different things. yardwork Nov 2025 #41
Mamdani SunImp Nov 2025 #78
When Mamdani campaigns with Trump at numerous campaign spots I'll definitely condemn that. Nanjeanne Nov 2025 #50
Me too, for the record. mr715 Nov 2025 #53
Spectacular double standard. Benefit of the doubt and praise for doing what many others betsuni Nov 2025 #61
I don't remember "lots of people on this very site" condemning Harris for this, so I went to the wayback machine. Scrivener7 Nov 2025 #62
Those pesky facts Cirsium Nov 2025 #72
There do seem to be some imaginary monsters floating around for some people. Scrivener7 Nov 2025 #76
This message was self-deleted by its author SunImp Nov 2025 #86
I was in the "Fuck Cheney" camp. Iggo Nov 2025 #109
OK. But posts from the time show you were in a very small minority here. Most here were overwhelmingly positive. Scrivener7 Nov 2025 #111
I look at Mamdani visiting the White House the same way I saw Pelosi visiting the White House. Iggo Nov 2025 #112
Kamala says in her book she campaigned with Cheney for a day and a half. betsuni Nov 2025 #64
She's "far right." As opposed to the pedophile in the WH mcar Nov 2025 #83
I'm amused by the whole affair. Clearly the Orange Pedophile is struggling to hold on against an apocalypse. As for... NNadir Nov 2025 #66
From the little I saw of it's comments, mcar Nov 2025 #84
Doesn't matter if the President is Satan himself Polybius Nov 2025 #88
From this morning: True Dough Nov 2025 #99
Not an apology. This is leadership. mr715 Nov 2025 #100
Still pushing this crap? NoRethugFriends Nov 2025 #101
I beg your pardon? mcar Nov 2025 #123
Well maybe, just maybe, he's trying to do what's best for New York City NoRethugFriends Nov 2025 #124
OK let's do this once again mcar Nov 2025 #126
Mamdani campaigned and won on his terms and then met with Trump at his request. Passages Nov 2025 #113
What remains to be seen is whether or not Mamdani will govern on the terms that he set forth in his campaign. lapucelle Nov 2025 #125
So far so good. Passages Nov 2025 #128
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's a good question re...»Reply #70