Alarm sounds as Roberts Supreme Court boosts Trump again and again

[bigtree]

7. read carefully

...you can't find anywhere that I've said any such thing that I 'think they'd rule on principle and precedent.'

You supposed they're more concerned with ideology than Trump (ie politics).

I disagree. As I said above, ideology would suggest there's some principle to their rulings, but that wouldn't come out of their decisions which have been inconsistent with conservative ideology; favoring Trump's executive actions, and tempering or nullifying Bidens, as the articles I bothered to provide as examples cite in detail.

They are ruling out of a desire to elevate this republican president, just as they, conversely, ruled to stifle or nullify the preceding Democratic president's executive actions and authority.

Their 'ideology' is a craven protection of republicans and republican favored initiatives. That's not ideology, it's politicization of justice and the law