Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

H2O Man

(78,180 posts)
15. And who do you
Wed Oct 22, 2025, 05:55 PM
Oct 22

think is responsible for "vetting" a person who runs in a campaign? Generally, "vetting" is what, for example, a candidate for president has done in deciding who will be her/his choice to run on the ticket, or a president select for a position that must have Senate confirmation. The idea of some group "vetting" who can or should run sounds rather close to the old, smoke-filled rooms of yester year.


In elections, of course, it is the voters who have either "vetted" a candidate, unless they simply vote party line. But considering that there are now more registered independents in the country than in either major party, I think more voters do the vetting.

Who do you hold responsible for not doing this vetting?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who recruited Platner and...»Reply #15