Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

usonian

(21,775 posts)
4. Digital is more compact. A terabyte or more drive fits in the palm of your hand.
Sat Oct 18, 2025, 10:50 PM
Saturday

I'm once again merging all my e-books into one place from various disks.

Any mention of destruction gets my goat, even the so-called "creative destruction" of Schumpeter.

Of course, flooding the world with algorithmic bullshit has a similar effect.

And the kicker is that "original" and rare things are hoarded by collectors, so we never see them anyway.

I have some first editions of magazines (most of which are defunct) and very few autographed books.

And I really have no use for them. I'd hand them down to my daughter and SIL, but they have no room for anything.

There are some printed books that have made my "move" list. (mainly, I can't find digital versions of what I already bought)

The Internet Archive has the same general idea, though I noticed that when they scan a book with halftones, they have a compromise contrast setting that leaves text-only pages with a gray background.

But I digress. I save what I can!

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why AI is needed to speed...»Reply #4