General Discussion

sop

(16,352 posts)

10. Police need a reasonably articulable suspicion that a crime has been or will be committed to arrest or detain

Sat Oct 4, 2025, 08:04 AM

Saturday

suspects without a warrant. And breaking down someone's door to enter their home without a warrant is only allowed under exigent circumstances. The Fourth Amendment protects citizens against unreasonable searches, but courts have recognized that some emergencies require immediate action, and in such cases the warrant requirement is waived.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

raging moderate eppur_se_muova Crunchy Frog

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Police need a warrant to take you into custody. [View all] no_hypocrisy Saturday OP

Because SCOTUS has enabled this administration to act extra-Constitutionally bucolic_frolic Saturday #1

I'll finish your sentence DaBronx Saturday #2

That's just not true.... sleroy49 Saturday #3

that's if they see you committing a crime and that's just not the case for almost all of these ICE LymphocyteLover Saturday #5

Since immigration violations are civil v. criminal... SickOfTheOnePct Saturday #8

so illegal immigrants have committed a civil violation, but are treated like the most violent LymphocyteLover Sunday #32

The police grab up perfectly peaceful protesters Farmer-Rick Saturday #15

No. The police don't have to witness the crime. sleroy49 Saturday #23

But what is the fucking crime? It's ignorance of your rights that allows this shit to continue. Solomon Sunday #29

Ok, but there should be probable cause, right? LymphocyteLover Sunday #33

And being colored or Hispanic infullview Saturday #6

Tell that to the Supreme Court. Gimpyknee Saturday #7

The Supremes have given up on the US Constitution Farmer-Rick Saturday #16

Except there was no probable cause in this case Martin Eden Saturday #9

This was a CRIME, and all ICE officers involved ought to be arrested and Jack Valentino Sunday #28

The BIGGEST CRIMINALS ordered this raid Martin Eden Sunday #34

Police need a reasonably articulable suspicion that a crime has been or will be committed to arrest or detain sop Saturday #10

Yes, I would really like some legal clarity on this LymphocyteLover Saturday #4

And don't forget the 4th amendment. For the most part the government can't enter your home without a warrant Buckeyeblue Saturday #11

Well, if Prizker isn't the governor to protect these citizens... Trueblue Texan Saturday #13

Agreed. And giving sternly worded press conferences does nothing Buckeyeblue Saturday #18

You should send these suggestions to him. nt Trueblue Texan Saturday #25

How about breaking down a door to your apartment in the middle of the night? surfered Saturday #12

A warrant is always required to enter someone's home...except under "exigent circumstances." sop Saturday #14

Has the Supreme Court ruled skin color to be an exigent circumstance ? surfered Saturday #19

Don't think they addressed exigency, but the SC's recent decision allows racial profiling during immigration raids. sop Saturday #20

Thank you. Do you believe the residents of that complex who are US citizens have a cause of action. surfered Saturday #21

Yes. sop Saturday #22

Thank you. Trump won't care, he's not going to pay any judgement. We will. surfered Saturday #24

Has Ice decided they operate outside the Constitution and the Amendments? yellow dahlia Saturday #26

In a word, yes. Deuxcents Sunday #27

The fucker-in-chief has 'unleashed them'. Nazi style. spanone Saturday #17

The Supremes have suspended the Constitution, Crunchy Frog Sunday #30

No they don't and your statement is false. They need probable cause to detain and if you resist that's obstructing. Hellbound Hellhound Sunday #31