Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

no_hypocrisy

(53,328 posts) Sat Oct 4, 2025, 05:44 AM Saturday

Police need a warrant to take you into custody. [View all]

State Police need a warrant to take you into custody.

The FBI needs a warrant to take you into custody.

Unless you're violent or dangerous, a warrant is necessary to take you into custody for all three.

Why can ICE take you into custody without a warrant and without you being a danger?

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Police need a warrant to take you into custody. [View all] no_hypocrisy Saturday OP

Because SCOTUS has enabled this administration to act extra-Constitutionally bucolic_frolic Saturday #1

I'll finish your sentence DaBronx Saturday #2

That's just not true.... sleroy49 Saturday #3

that's if they see you committing a crime and that's just not the case for almost all of these ICE LymphocyteLover Saturday #5

Since immigration violations are civil v. criminal... SickOfTheOnePct Saturday #8

so illegal immigrants have committed a civil violation, but are treated like the most violent LymphocyteLover Sunday #32

The police grab up perfectly peaceful protesters Farmer-Rick Saturday #15

No. The police don't have to witness the crime. sleroy49 Saturday #23

But what is the fucking crime? It's ignorance of your rights that allows this shit to continue. Solomon Sunday #29

Ok, but there should be probable cause, right? LymphocyteLover Sunday #33

And being colored or Hispanic infullview Saturday #6

Tell that to the Supreme Court. Gimpyknee Saturday #7

The Supremes have given up on the US Constitution Farmer-Rick Saturday #16

Except there was no probable cause in this case Martin Eden Saturday #9

This was a CRIME, and all ICE officers involved ought to be arrested and Jack Valentino Sunday #28

The BIGGEST CRIMINALS ordered this raid Martin Eden Sunday #34

Police need a reasonably articulable suspicion that a crime has been or will be committed to arrest or detain sop Saturday #10

Yes, I would really like some legal clarity on this LymphocyteLover Saturday #4

And don't forget the 4th amendment. For the most part the government can't enter your home without a warrant Buckeyeblue Saturday #11

Well, if Prizker isn't the governor to protect these citizens... Trueblue Texan Saturday #13

Agreed. And giving sternly worded press conferences does nothing Buckeyeblue Saturday #18

You should send these suggestions to him. nt Trueblue Texan Saturday #25

How about breaking down a door to your apartment in the middle of the night? surfered Saturday #12

A warrant is always required to enter someone's home...except under "exigent circumstances." sop Saturday #14

Has the Supreme Court ruled skin color to be an exigent circumstance ? surfered Saturday #19

Don't think they addressed exigency, but the SC's recent decision allows racial profiling during immigration raids. sop Saturday #20

Thank you. Do you believe the residents of that complex who are US citizens have a cause of action. surfered Saturday #21

Yes. sop Saturday #22

Thank you. Trump won't care, he's not going to pay any judgement. We will. surfered Saturday #24

Has Ice decided they operate outside the Constitution and the Amendments? yellow dahlia Saturday #26

In a word, yes. Deuxcents Sunday #27

The fucker-in-chief has 'unleashed them'. Nazi style. spanone Saturday #17

The Supremes have suspended the Constitution, Crunchy Frog Sunday #30

No they don't and your statement is false. They need probable cause to detain and if you resist that's obstructing. Hellbound Hellhound Sunday #31