Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DFW

(59,330 posts)
20. Except for when I lived in Spain, most of my education was in English.
Sun Sep 28, 2025, 10:35 AM
Sep 28

As opposed to:

EXCERPTS FROM THE OFFICIAL DICTIONARY OF REPUBLICANESE

In Republicanese, many words that sound alike may be spelled differently at random. A few prominent examples:

In Republicanese, the following words may be spelled at random using any of the three ways given:

A.) Two, Too, To
B.) Their, They're, There
c.) Your, Yore, You're

The Republicanese version of Robin Hood therefore starts with "In days of you're...."

The only rule is that the correct use of them as in English is never permitted twice in a row.

Words with single letters that change meaning when that letter is doubled must never be used in correct English context. The classic example is “lose” vs. “loose.” In Republicanese, if you do not win an election, then you “loose” that election. Conversely, if your (Republicanese: you’re) belt is too tight, you need it more “lose” in order to be comfortable. Another example would be the Republicanese, “I met Donald Trump, and he was rudder than I imagined,” vs. “I grabbed the ruder and was able to steer the boat to shore.”

In English, the contraction for "it is" is written "it's." To show possession referring to something previously mentioned, one writes "its." In Republicanese, it is the other way around. Example:
English: “It's impractical for a building to have its solar panels in the basement.”
Republicanese: “Its impractical for a building to have it's solar panels in the basement.”


In Republicanese, idiomatic expressions that use words that are homonyms with animals in English must use the spelling that denotes the animal.
Three examples:
In English, when someone wins a race by a very small margin, one can say, “He won the race by a hair.” In Republicanese, one writes, “He won the race by a hare.”
In English, someone fleeing the law can be said to be on “on the lam.” In Republicanese, that is spelled “on the lamb.”
In English, when one starts to lose their voice after shouting for an extended time, one says, “he shouted himself hoarse.” In Republicanese, one writes, “He shouted himself horse.”


In Republicanese, an apostrophe is used to form a plural, whereas this is never correct in English. But it must be done at random, never systematically. For example, Bill and Hillary are "the Clinton's," but Bill, Chelsea and Hillary are "the Clintons." The other way around is also correct. In Republicanese, either form is correct as long as it is not spelled the same way twice in a row.
Example:
In English, one writes "The Clintons like dogs."
In Republicanese, this can be written as "The Clinton's like dogs," or "The Clintons like dog's" or "The Clinton's like dog's." The only version that would be incorrect in Republicanese would be to use no apostrophe at all. Only English is written that way.

In Republicanese, pronouns that are direct or indirect objects must never be used as in English when combined with another proper name, proper noun, or pronoun.
Example: in English, one says, e.g., “John went to dinner with me,” and not “John went to dinner with I.” Therefore, in English, one also says, “John went to dinner with my wife and me.” In Republicanese, while it is also correct to say, “John went to dinner with me,” it is only correct to say “John went to dinner with my wife and I.”

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wonderful vignette. cachukis Sep 27 #1
3 nations are on a death watch NJCher Sep 27 #2
Argentina now too IbogaProject Sep 27 #6
I devoutly hope that something will. raccoon Sep 27 #8
I have had a similar experience. MLWR Sep 27 #3
Our current two-party system consists of the Party of Trump and the Party of Silence dalton99a Sep 27 #4
Not in my experience. Are you on mailing lists for Indivisible and your local Democratic activists? Hekate Sep 27 #16
Thanks for the news. You do a great job explaining what their news doesn't. You might add some numbers ancianita Sep 27 #5
Is the problem with European news media companies KS Toronado Sep 27 #7
No, quite different DFW Sep 27 #11
I see said the blind man KS Toronado Sep 27 #12
Kimmel and Colbert are celebrities. Trump was a celebrity before he was a politician. highplainsdem Sep 27 #9
I'm not sure we'd be well-advised to have a clear front-runner right now DFW Sep 27 #13
Agreed. Every time it looks like we have a frontrunner who is an actual politician (it's a knack)... Hekate Sep 27 #17
I still like him! DFW Sep 27 #18
Good to know. Thanks. 58Sunliner Sep 27 #10
thank you for a nice description in part about normal life elsewhere ClaudetteCC Sep 27 #14
TY so much for this. The "US Dems aren't doing/saying anything" trope is a popular one at DU itself... Hekate Sep 27 #15
It was so enjoyable reading your post DeeDeeNY Sep 28 #19
Except for when I lived in Spain, most of my education was in English. DFW Sep 28 #20
There is also this Republicanese phrase that doesn't adhere to rules except bad spelling -- DeeDeeNY Sep 28 #21
Noteworthy that they never follow their own instructions! n/t DFW Sep 28 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Market day in a small Ger...»Reply #20