Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Elon Musk sparks backlash after issuing 48-hour assignment to employees: 'This is due by noon on Thursday' [View all]Disaffected
(6,011 posts)17. I don't think it is actually "micromanaging"
because the entire work force (or at least most of it) is apparently the subject of the directive and for that to happen the CEO would have to be involved.
I would also expect the CEO would not be directly involved in the evaluation of the replies (at least for the non-management employees).
Again, if an employee cannot justify his/her employment, it needs to be evaluated - either the employee is reassigned to a more productive role or is let go. It may also be an exercise in self-help/awareness for some employees - some may realize they are not performing a particularly valuable role at the company and therefore choose to look elsewhere for something more suitable. Or, maybe the company would do that for them...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Elon Musk sparks backlash after issuing 48-hour assignment to employees: 'This is due by noon on Thursday' [View all]
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Sep 25
OP
It's a prelude to job cuts, I think. Cash flow problems? Investors getting skittish?
Bernardo de La Paz
Sep 25
#33
If the CEO doesn't know that this kind of action really isn't in his scope of work, he shouldn't be a CEO.
WhiskeyGrinder
Sep 25
#7
CEOs generally should not be involved in the minutiae of every employee like this. It's called micromanaging, and it's a
WhiskeyGrinder
Sep 25
#12
It's the very definition of micromanaging, just like the shitty putz attempted with doge before he ran off
Blues Heron
Sep 25
#19
Asking each person for exactly (micro) what they did (managing) is not like giving a raise. Come on man
Blues Heron
Sep 25
#44
An employer should know that info without resorting to employees for instruction
Torchlight
Sep 25
#26
It's a time-wasting exercise leading to big personnel errors. It's like the old "lines of code" metric.
Bernardo de La Paz
Sep 25
#35
Many years ago when I lived in Rhode Island, we had a wonderful broadcaster on WPRO radio
Totally Tunsie
Sep 25
#23