Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ProfessorGAC

(75,052 posts)

15. Try Reading What I Wrote

Reply to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #12)

Thu Sep 25, 2025, 12:39 PM

Sep 25

You're wrong. The numbers are right there.
Disney is down 2% since the 17th. The Dow is the same.
Disney, since September 17, did not go down as the rest of the market, because the Dow, of which Disney is a part, did not go down.
I provided greater context with the 30 days, and that was abundantly clear.
You're insisting on being right when the actual market numbers contradict your view.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Disney Hit With Legal Salvo From Shareholders Over Jimmy Kimmel Suspension [View all] Amaryllis Sep 25 OP

Nice one firing Jimmy Kimmel Bob Iger! A true masterstroke! Fil1957 Sep 25 #1

It was a stroke alright Aviation Pro Sep 25 #2

this i think, has lit a fuze so to speak. AllaN01Bear Sep 25 #3

I hope these investor groups throw a good shot across the bow with this action, but... SpankMe Sep 25 #4

Completely support them doing this... SickOfTheOnePct Sep 25 #5

One merit, but "plummet"? Ha! About what the whole market fluctuated in the same time. Normal. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 25 #6

Agree 100% n/t SickOfTheOnePct Sep 25 #7

Huh? ProfessorGAC Sep 25 #11

Kimmel was not fired 30 days ago. 3.36 pc or 1.6 pc or 2 pc up or down is normal for 30 days or 5 days or 8 days. . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 25 #12

Try Reading What I Wrote ProfessorGAC Sep 25 #15

I read what you wrote. The suit is seeking transparency about the capitulation. There is no case over stock value Bernardo de La Paz Sep 25 #16

Just For Clarity ProfessorGAC Sep 25 #8

Not to defend the mouse, but we need to understand Bluetus Sep 25 #9

I Guess We'll See ProfessorGAC Sep 25 #10

I am not sure we WILL see. Most of what is important in our society Bluetus Sep 25 #14

The plaintiffs will lose unless there is a smoking bombshell in the "records", which I doubt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 25 #13