Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bluetus

(1,583 posts)
10. Yes. But let's generalize the advice.
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 12:33 PM
Thursday

We get nowhere with a message "Trump is a poopy head"

Americans get that. But they think most politicians from BOTH parties are all poopy heads.

We need to have specific ideas, clear actions we promise to fight for, if the American people will support us. And if they give us a governing majority, then we promise we will get these SPECIFIC things done.

Breaking up the monopolies is a very good starting point. We have cartels acting in nearly every major industry: insurance, telecom, pharma, the media and so on. We SHOULD act on that.

But there are also very specific things we should running on in other areas. We should have specific plans for making billionaires pay their fair share for the society that has made them spectacularly wealthy and provides then the safety to hoard their wealth.

We should have a specific plan for cutting our HC costs in half. And the only plan that gets us there is Medicare for all.

We should have specific plans, not just vague talk, about gun violence, and that must include eliminating the military assault weapons.

We must deal with the accelerating cost of university-level education. Where are the specific proposals? A first step is to charge student loans the lowest interest rate that the biggest corporations get.

And so on.

These are all ideas the public supports by strong majorities, even before candidates get out in from of that parade.

Recommendations

8 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Who was it who signed the Telecommunications Act? gab13by13 Thursday #1
Post removed Post removed Thursday #3
Billy boy John Coktosten Thursday #4
Bravo, but this begs a very important question for Senator Murphy: Fiendish Thingy Thursday #2
monopolies tfury653 Thursday #5
and the result was..... lastlib Thursday #13
You can start by returning to exempting the news programs from having to survive by ratings. OldBaldy1701E Thursday #6
Excellent point. calimary Thursday #7
I don't know it ever worked that way. When did that change? Takket Thursday #9
The late seventies to early eighties. OldBaldy1701E Friday #28
When have news shows ever relied on ratings to survive? SickOfTheOnePct Thursday #11
Well, first we have to find a defiinition of "news shows" progressoid Thursday #17
Ah got it, thanks SickOfTheOnePct Thursday #19
They rely on advertising to survive Captain Zero Friday #26
They don't, really. OldBaldy1701E Friday #29
Sure, a "public service" managed by that great "public servant".... reACTIONary Thursday #15
Yup. (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Friday #30
Will never kacekwl Thursday #8
Yes. But let's generalize the advice. Bluetus Thursday #10
break up maliaSmith Thursday #12
It is unpatriotic not to tell the truth, whether about the president or anyone else. Theodore Roosevelt Ping Tung Thursday #14
I doubt many MAGAs even know who he is. progressoid Thursday #18
First st3p is expanding the USSC to 13 Warpy Thursday #16
THIS!!! calimary Thursday #24
AND BIG ,MEDIA WILL DESTROY DEMS JUST AS THEY DID DEAN. pansypoo53219 Thursday #20
I think Chris Murphy is one of the best communicators the Dem party has. yellow dahlia Thursday #21
The breakup of the original "Ma Bell", American Telephone & Telegraph, into the Baby Bells dobleremolque Thursday #22
Laughable Captain Obvious .... Too little way too late. I remember the race for media outlets live love laugh Thursday #23
Only problem is Diraven Friday #25
The Telecommunications Act killed progressive/liberal/non-conservative radio. no_hypocrisy Friday #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yes Senator Murphy! Yes! ...»Reply #10