Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lapucelle

(20,747 posts)
25. A quorum was not present.
Sun Sep 21, 2025, 08:08 PM
Sunday

That means that either all of the Democrats and some of the Republicans were not in the chamber or that some Democrats and some Republicans were not there. Either way, at least 51 senators appear to have skipped the shit show.

Senate rules presume a quorum in legislative session. In other words, "we do have a quorum" is the default setting.

The roll gets called only if a senator "suggests the absence of quorum".

If a motion to rescind the quorum call (stop the roll call) is passed by unanimous consent, the issue of a quorum goes back to its default setting, i.e. the presumption of a quorum.

-----------------------------------

- Scott (R) ("notwithstanding rule XXII" ) was careful not to invoke cloture.

- At the end of his ridiculous speech, Tuberville (R), suggested the absence of a quorum, and a roll call was ordered and initiated

- The roll call was stopped when Lankford (R) asked for unanimous consent for the quorum call to be rescinded.

---------------------------------------------

The resolution itself was "approved" by a voice vote of those present in the chamber.

------------------------------------------------

From the Congressional Record:

Mr. SCOTT of Florida: Mr. President, as if in legislative session and notwithstanding rule XXII, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the consideration of S. Res. 403, which was submitted earlier today.

snip-------------------------------------------

Mr. Tuberville: I suggest the absence of a quorum.

The PRESIDING OFFICER: The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant executive clerk proceeded to call the roll.

Mr. LANKFORD: Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.

The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr.MORENO): Without objection, it is so ordered

https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-171/issue-153/senate-section/article/S6713-1

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author drray23 Friday #1
This message was self-deleted by its author drray23 Friday #2
From what I can see, there was not a full senate vote questionseverything Friday #3
I think ABC and other MSM headlines are intentionally putting up misleading headlines, trying to represent lostincalifornia Friday #7
They only need 51 present for a quorum to take a voice vote Fiendish Thingy Friday #4
Either walked or weren't paying attention, but It is very unlikely that in a formal vote you would have Senate lostincalifornia Friday #8
A quorum was not present. lapucelle Sunday #25
Thank you, lostincalifornia. sheshe2 Friday #5
It just that there seems to be so many outlets pushing a misleading narrative. I think it is prudent that we lostincalifornia Friday #12
I did a quick search before responding. sheshe2 Friday #16
More Info: TheProle Friday #6
Thank-you. A misleading headline from many of the MSM "news" outlets. lostincalifornia Friday #9
The country's lost its goddamn mind. TheProle Friday #10
and I don't think Antipsychotics will solve the problem, or maybe that is the problem, too many are already on them. lostincalifornia Friday #13
Thank You, The Prole! Cha Friday #20
It was just a Republican stunt. Quiet Em Friday #11
I think so, and from what I am observing a lot of the MSM don't mind pushing the misleading headline that lostincalifornia Friday #14
They've been extremely misleading Quiet Em Friday #17
Of course, the m$$$m Doesn't mind getting it Cha Friday #22
Thanks Cha. lostincalifornia Friday #23
You're Welcome, Cha Saturday #24
Thank you for explaining kavotheclown Friday #15
Thanks for this mcar Friday #18
It passed by unanimous consent. Wiz Imp Friday #19
TY for bringing this up. Given the tally in the House I have also found the Senate claim baffling. Hekate Friday #21
The bottom line is that there was no tally in the Senate because a quorum wasn't present. lapucelle Sunday #26
Kick nt Justice matters. Sunday #27
There is no tally. The resolution was "approved" by a voice vote of those present. There was no quorum. lapucelle Sunday #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There have been several O...»Reply #25