Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pat_k

(11,558 posts)

9. Reporting from BBC points out the vagueness of it all

Reply to Sogo (Reply #8)

Thu Jul 17, 2025, 11:34 PM

Jul 17

It's not even clear WHAT grand jury testimony he is ordering her to make a futile effort to get released (early 2000's or the testimony that lead to the 2019 charges).
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9w1014rlq9o

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sogo

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did Krasnov Just Tell Bondi To Release The Epstein Grand Jury Transcripts? [View all] gab13by13 Jul 17 OP

100% Blue Full Moon Jul 17 #1

Illegal.. albacore Jul 17 #2

So, it's an empty gesture to demonize courts further "We tried, but the corrupt court said no" pat_k Jul 17 #6

Recommended. H2O Man Jul 17 #3

Grand jury materials can't be released without court approval, Ocelot II Jul 17 #4

Charlie Kirk is eating up the empty gesture. pat_k Jul 17 #7

He's panicking and needs a big distraction badly. GoodRaisin Jul 17 #5

The operative word is "pertinent." Sogo Jul 17 #8

Reporting from BBC points out the vagueness of it all pat_k Jul 17 #9

Taco likely to Taco on this Johonny Jul 17 #10

The "pertinent" transcripts. mzmolly Jul 17 #11

The transcripts are like 1% of the data in the files and the only portion that need court approval still-prayin4rain Jul 17 #12

Can't remember where I read this, but jmbar2 Jul 18 #13