General Discussion

pat_k

(11,592 posts)

7. Charlie Kirk is eating up the empty gesture.

Thu Jul 17, 2025, 11:27 PM

Jul 17

Clearly, it's an empty gesture that has the bonus of being able to demonize courts further "We tried, but the corrupt court said no"

I have a feeling that the Epstein diehards in MAGA will actually "get" that it is just a shell game.

Time will tell.

Who knows? The 47 regime's gamble could backfire.

I can't imagine it happening, but there is a lot happening that is so far beyond my wildest fears, I have given up prognosticating on anything. Perhaps the court will find that some of the testimony needs to be released in the public interest, not for whatever bullshit argument Bondi's DOJ makes, but for a reality-based "on it's own motion" finding that the nation has a right to know its president's involvement.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did Krasnov Just Tell Bondi To Release The Epstein Grand Jury Transcripts? [View all] gab13by13 Jul 17 OP

100% Blue Full Moon Jul 17 #1

Illegal.. albacore Jul 17 #2

So, it's an empty gesture to demonize courts further "We tried, but the corrupt court said no" pat_k Jul 17 #6

Recommended. H2O Man Jul 17 #3

Grand jury materials can't be released without court approval, Ocelot II Jul 17 #4

Charlie Kirk is eating up the empty gesture. pat_k Jul 17 #7

He's panicking and needs a big distraction badly. GoodRaisin Jul 17 #5

The operative word is "pertinent." Sogo Jul 17 #8

Reporting from BBC points out the vagueness of it all pat_k Jul 17 #9

Taco likely to Taco on this Johonny Jul 17 #10

The "pertinent" transcripts. mzmolly Jul 17 #11

The transcripts are like 1% of the data in the files and the only portion that need court approval still-prayin4rain Jul 17 #12

Can't remember where I read this, but jmbar2 Jul 18 #13