Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(29,289 posts)

4. He would look bad if he didn't.

Thu Jul 17, 2025, 09:41 PM

Jul 17

I'm positive the WSJ knew he would sue them when it released the story.

I'm just leery about the WSJ, hope it isn't a false flag.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Let's get it to trial and have some discovery...yippee... wcmagumba Jul 17 #1

Yes please!!! SheltieLover Jul 17 #3

Please proceed! SheltieLover Jul 17 #2

He would look bad if he didn't. gab13by13 Jul 17 #4

Just wait for Fux to jump ship malaise Jul 17 #6

Sue for what? The WSJ is an experienced newsroom with a battery of attorneys allegorical oracle Jul 17 #7

Not sure the WSJ is in possession of the source product, gab13by13 Jul 17 #8