Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Balancing the Supreme Court with a new Chief Justice. [View all]Wiz Imp
(6,061 posts)94. How do you know they didn't try to change minds?
In fact, there were far more Democrats supporting it in 2024 than just 2 years earlier. Likewise, the legislation reintroduced in 2023 got far more support than it did initially in 2021. But Manchin and Sinema were never going to change their minds and without them - passage of court expansion was impossible.
To be honest, imposing term limits on Supreme Court justices would be much easier to pass. No, it would not solve all the problems that court expansion would, but it would be a huge improvement over the status quo. Even a majority of Republicans favor term limits.
https://www.axios.com/2024/09/13/supreme-court-term-limits-ethics
Most Americans back term limits for Supreme Court: poll
Breaking it down: 69% of people in the Annenberg survey support a mandatory retirement age for Supreme Court justices, and 68% endorse term limits for the justices.
President Biden recently endorsed term limits, under pressure from his party's more liberal wing.
Such a system would give each president the ability to appoint two new justices, so the ideological makeup of the court would track more closely with voters' electoral preferences.
President Biden recently endorsed term limits, under pressure from his party's more liberal wing.
Such a system would give each president the ability to appoint two new justices, so the ideological makeup of the court would track more closely with voters' electoral preferences.
https://apnorc.org/ap-norc-poll-2-in-3-in-us-favor-term-limits-for-justices/
AP-NORC poll: 2 in 3 in US favor term limits for justices
WASHINGTON (AP) About 2 in 3 Americans say they favor term limits or a mandatory retirement age for Supreme Court justices, according to a new poll that finds a sharp increase in the percentage of Americans saying they have hardly any confidence in the court.
The poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research finds 67% of Americans support a proposal to set a specific number of years that justices serve instead of life terms, including 82% of Democrats and 57% of Republicans. Views are similar about a requirement that justices retire by a specific age.
The poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research finds 67% of Americans support a proposal to set a specific number of years that justices serve instead of life terms, including 82% of Democrats and 57% of Republicans. Views are similar about a requirement that justices retire by a specific age.
https://www.judges.org/news-and-info/many-judges-support-term-limits-for-scotus-but-its-complicated/
Many judges support term limits for SCOTUS, but its complicated
Ask judges if they think there should be term limits for justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, and you get strong and widely varying opinions.
We know because our Question of the Month* emailed to NJC alumni in November asked, Do you support the concept of an 18-year term limit for justices of the Supreme Court of the United States?
The final tally: 399 judges voted, and approval of the 18-year term limit won 57.5 percent to 42.5. percent.
The question asked about an 18-year term because in October, a bipartisan group of legal experts, which included a federal appeals court judge and a former U.S. solicitor general, endorsed that term length. The group called the proposal a vital reform that would reduce partisanship and improve the judiciarys overall reputation.
We know because our Question of the Month* emailed to NJC alumni in November asked, Do you support the concept of an 18-year term limit for justices of the Supreme Court of the United States?
The final tally: 399 judges voted, and approval of the 18-year term limit won 57.5 percent to 42.5. percent.
The question asked about an 18-year term because in October, a bipartisan group of legal experts, which included a federal appeals court judge and a former U.S. solicitor general, endorsed that term length. The group called the proposal a vital reform that would reduce partisanship and improve the judiciarys overall reputation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
115 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I'm willing to take that chance. I want them to live and die by all the policies they claim to like
In It to Win It
Jul 10
#18
And exactly when could they have "balanced out the court" even if they got rid of the filibuster?
Wiz Imp
Jul 10
#51
With the majority, you can do away with the filibuster with a simple rule passed by Rules Committee.
kentuck
Jul 10
#52
Um, the President doesn't just appoint justices. They have to be confirmed by the Senate.
Wiz Imp
Jul 10
#56
Even if I ignore all the current Senators and agree they could possibly be convinced to support court expansion
Wiz Imp
Jul 10
#93
By "slippery slope" I just meant if impeach a Justice for a ruling we don't agree with it would be unprecedented
Polybius
Jul 10
#24
If not, we may have no other choice but to just wait, since Roberts, Alito, and especially Thomas are old
Polybius
Jul 10
#65
Which would seemingly to lead us to Jackson's apocryphal challenge to Marshall.
tritsofme
Jul 10
#22
The powers the SCOTUS claims were only established via Marbury vs Madison
Fiendish Thingy
Jul 10
#63
I agree that expanding the Court is the only way to undo the damage by Trump and Robert's Court.
kentuck
Jul 10
#35
Republicans CAN NOT block a Democratic President from appointing a Supreme Court Justice as long as the
Wiz Imp
Jul 10
#54