Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Read earlier that Mc Connell and three other FalloutShelter Wednesday #1
Will Fetterman rescue him? Renew Deal Wednesday #5
That's backwards. They're actually going to vote YES Wiz Imp Wednesday #8
Thanks. FalloutShelter Wednesday #9
Recommended. H2O Man Wednesday #2
I await your take on malaise Wednesday #3
Canada wasn't on the list today. Scrivener7 Wednesday #4
Only problem will be BumRushDaShow Wednesday #6
House Democrats believe they may have found a way to circumvent GOP leaders on the issue of tariff policy. Wiz Imp Wednesday #11
Yeah we can push it to the floor BumRushDaShow Wednesday #15
Sen Collins May finally be "concerned" enough to vote against. surfered Wednesday #7
Word hotdamn00 Wednesday #10
This message was self-deleted by its author orangecrush Wednesday #12
Senate Dems foreshadow more forced votes to block Trump's emergency orders Wiz Imp Wednesday #13
Thanks for the link malaise Wednesday #14
There's nothing about emergency orders, or, frankly, emergency ANYTHING from this schmuck. calimary Wednesday #16
This is huge malaise Wednesday #17
This is a bigger problem than just Canada. BidenRocks Wednesday #18
He will be impeached again malaise Wednesday #19
Oh, wouldn't that be great? red dog 1 Wednesday #21
I seriously believe his second term will be significantly shorter than Nixons malaise Wednesday #22
UPDATE: Four Republicans join Democrats in Senate with 51 votes to end Trump tariff on Canadian goods, red dog 1 Wednesday #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pssssst! Word is that he...»Reply #17