Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TwilightZone

(28,836 posts)
2. In the context of the discussion, it's probably true.
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 02:57 PM
Feb 2024

The context being today's hearing and the 14th Amendment. I think the Colorado case probably effectively ended the 14th discussion at the state level, so from that perspective, the assessment is correct, but only on the issue of 14th Amendment eligibility for individual states.

I don't think they meant it in a general sense, as in Colorado decided all factors of the election. I think they just meant it in the context of the conversation they were having, which was in regards to today's hearing.

It remains to be seen if the case can be approached at the federal level, i.e. a lawsuit challenging Trump's eligibility nationally as a Constitutional issue.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Colorado is NOT "deciding...»Reply #2