Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They aren't required to compensate for damages done when raiding the wrong ... marble falls Oct 2023 #1
dont ya know the gestapo is above the law nt msongs Oct 2023 #2
"where all sides agreed..." don't see how SWAT and all sides agreeing fit uponit7771 Oct 2023 #3
This is just wrong! markpkessinger Oct 2023 #4
And if there's a mortgage, the homeowner will be paying on nothing... brush Oct 2023 #8
Judge Higginson who wrote the opinion was appointed by Obama. former9thward Oct 2023 #11
Thanks. You're so helpful. But what about the other judges on the Fifth Circuit? brush Oct 2023 #12
Even if it's not legally *required*, what about some basic decency here? Silent3 Oct 2023 #5
"they should all contribute to a joint insurance fund to cover things like this" Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2023 #13
Are you saying the city probably is insured, but the city's insurer is fighting the payout? Silent3 Oct 2023 #14
Both. I'm saying this is very likely a battle behind the scenes of the insurance companies. Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2023 #15
As a society, we should protect citizens when they, through no fault of their own... Silent3 Oct 2023 #17
Works for me. Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2023 #18
If swat destroys my home they are oaying moonshinegnomie Oct 2023 #6
Future is not looking so good anywhere. PufPuf23 Oct 2023 #7
That sounds really unfair ecstatic Oct 2023 #9
Unless NowISeetheLight Oct 2023 #10
shithole court is loaded with RW appointees Celerity Oct 2023 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»5th Circuit holds that a ...»Reply #2