Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Every and any avenue should be pursued to keep his ass off the primary and general election ballots. magicarpet Sep 2023 #1
What about the suits to keep on ON the ballot. That's really the point of the issue. ancianita Sep 2023 #5
Not so, at least according to Judge Luttig and Lawrence Tribe. Ocelot II Sep 2023 #2
I read it (I subscribe). I saw their joint interview on MSNBC. I get it. ancianita Sep 2023 #6
THIS!!☝️its plain & simple wording. We all saw in real time & J6 hearing laid bare onetexan Sep 2023 #19
Blue states set a dangerous precedent if they remove him from the ballot. Runningdawg Sep 2023 #3
Red states need justifiable grounds to keep Biden off their ballots. magicarpet Sep 2023 #9
If Trump can be removed before conviction so can Biden. It doesn't matter if ANY of its legal. Runningdawg Sep 2023 #11
Refusing to send the National Guard in for hours was giving them aid. His tweets pnwmom Sep 2023 #4
Okay. But those words aren't stated in the indictment. I hope the Smith team reiterate that to ancianita Sep 2023 #7
Here are the points of the indictment I'm referring to, starting on page 41. pnwmom Sep 2023 #14
Only the 'love' tweet to insurrectionists is aid & comfort. The others are examples of ancianita Sep 2023 #15
The insurrectionists were there to stop Pence from certifying the election for Biden. pnwmom Sep 2023 #16
Okay. I'm convinced. I think that's key to the states' ballot issue. I don't think that without ancianita Sep 2023 #17
A lot is riding on Meadows removal request. So let's hope. nt pnwmom Sep 2023 #18
THIS!!☝️ onetexan Sep 2023 #20
The DC jury to which you refer is not really relevant rsdsharp Sep 2023 #8
I clearly meant the future petit jury. I'm aware that it's not the grand jury's decision. The grand ancianita Sep 2023 #10
I apologize for having misread the post. I thought you were saying the jury had ruled. rsdsharp Sep 2023 #12
Not a problem! ancianita Sep 2023 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Secretaries of State cann...»Reply #18